Where is the question and what is it?
Answer:
<h2>y-intercept = 3</h2><h2>x-intercept - not exist</h2><h2>the graph is increasing</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
The exponential function:

has y-intercept for x = 0
hasn't x-intercept
if a > 1, then is increasing
if 0 < a < 1, then is decreasing
We have

a = 2 >1 - increasing
for x = 0:

Answer:
A, C
Step-by-step explanation:
Actually, those questions require us to develop those equations to derive into trigonometrical equations so that we can unveil them or not. Doing it only two alternatives, the other ones will not result in Trigonometrical Identities.
Examining
A) True

Double angle 
B) False,
No further development towards a Trig Identity
C) True
Double Angle Sine Formula 

D) False No further development towards a Trig Identity
![[sin(x)-cos(x)]^{2} =1+sin(2x)\\ sin^{2} (x)-2sin(x)cos(x)+cos^{2}x=1+2sinxcosx\\ \\sin^{2} (x)+cos^{2}x=1+4sin(x)cos(x)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Bsin%28x%29-cos%28x%29%5D%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D1%2Bsin%282x%29%5C%5C%20sin%5E%7B2%7D%20%28x%29-2sin%28x%29cos%28x%29%2Bcos%5E%7B2%7Dx%3D1%2B2sinxcosx%5C%5C%20%5C%5Csin%5E%7B2%7D%20%28x%29%2Bcos%5E%7B2%7Dx%3D1%2B4sin%28x%29cos%28x%29)
Answer:
If q, then p
Step-by-step explanation:
The given conditional statement is "If p, then q"
We want to find the converse of this conditional statement.
The converse is formed by switching the hypothesis (p) and the conclusion (q).
Therefore the converse of the given conditional is "If q, then p"