I believe that people can control 100% of what happen to them at work strongly agree or strongly disagree

A salesperson working for Broker A sells a $150,000 home listed with another brokerage. The listing commission is 6.5 percent of

Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

She is entitled to $3,217.5

Explanation:

First the amount the brokers and sales person are interested in is 6.5% of the selling price ($150,000). so calculating 6.5% of the selling price;

6.5% = 6.5/100 = 0.065

∴ 6.5% of $150,000 = 0.065 × 150,000 = $9,750

Next, we are interested in the cooperating broker (Broker A), who the sales person works for. Note that a cooperating broker is the broker who facilitates a real estate transaction, along with a listing broker who listed the property, and in this case the listing broker is Broker A, who the sales person works for.

We are told that the cooperating broker takes 60% of the listing commission ($9,750);

Therefore, 60% of $9,750 = 0.6 × 9,750 = $5,850

Next, we are also told that out of this amount, the sales person is responsible for 55% of the listing commission entering the cooperate broker's office;

Therefore, 55% of $5,850 = 0.55 × 5,850 = $3,217.5

Therefore the sales person is entitled to $3,217.5

8 0

4 years ago

A group of computers that are interconnected in order to share information or documents is called a

Mashutka [201]

A group of such computers - which get interconnected in order to share information or documents are usually called a computer network.
This is a common type of networking when working in large companies or businesses.

5 0

3 years ago

g Compare and contrast a four Ps approach to marketing versus the value approach (creating, communicating, delivering and exchan

abruzzese [7]

Answer:

The 4Ps are Product, Pricing, Promotion, Place.

Explanation:

Thinking about it carefully, one would note that there is really nothing to contrast between the value approach which is Creating, Communicating, Delivering and Exchanging Value.

Let's make the comparisons:

Products and Services are Created. It's impossible to have a product or service that is not created.

The inherent quality of a Utility or Product or Service is that they are value which is Created. So in describing the marketing approach, one can use both interchangeably.

Pricing vs Exchanging Value

Again there is a parallel here. Price is the value you have put on your product or service. Without price, it's difficult to exchange value. Again in the marketing process/approach, it's difficult to separate the two. In both approaches, pricing and Exchanging Value as steps in the marketing approach can be used interchangeably.

Communicating vs Promotion

This is also another parallel. Promotion is simply another way to communicate the value of your product. Both are really not different.

Delivering Value vs Place

Place under the 4 Ps approach speaks to the location where the product is delivered. Again it's clear to see that both cannot be separated.

In conclusion, assuming all factors are the same and held constant between two companies A and B, if company A follows the 4Ps approach and company B follows the Value approach, they are most likely to arrive at the same results.

Cheers!

5 0

3 years ago

What is meant by allocative efficiency? Allocative efficiency is when every good or service A. is produced up to the point where

Alborosie

Answer:

Option (E) is correct.

Explanation:

Allocative efficiency is created when the gap between marginal benefit and marginal cost is maximum. The marginal benefit is the benefit that a consumer can get by consuming an additional unit of a commodity and the marginal cost is the cost that a producer incurred by producing an additional unit.

Hence, the allocative efficiency is achieved where the difference between these two terms is maximized.

5 0

3 years ago

How can the government promote industrial development in south africa?

quester [9]

Answer:

<em>The growth center concept has formed the cornerstone of industrial development policy in South Africa since apartheid was introduced as a constitutional model in 1948. This paper attempts to recapture the evolutionary development of industrial policy in South Africa and to underline prominent deficiencies in present industrial development policy. South African industrial policy continues the segregation practices of the past, despite the government's repeated statements in recent years that it intends to move away from the concept of apartheid. Guidelines for a revision in industrial development thinking based on sound economic principles rather than concealed political practices are suggested for the country.</em>

8 0

3 years ago