The correct answer is this - <span>this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting.
If the conditions were a little bit different, then his IRB review would also require different results. However, since there is no real interaction with the children, but rather only observation, an IRB review is not necessary in this case and can be avoided.
</span>
Answer:
He is having difficulty in the area of 4) pragmatics.
Explanation:
The term pragmatics was coined in the 1930s by psychologist Charles Morris. This subfield of linguistics studies the social language skills that we use in our interactions, how we produce and understand meanings through language while communicating with others. That means pragmatics analyzes not only what we say, but also the way we say it, our body language, facial expressions, gestures, and how appropriately we interact. It is this part that concerns Cade. He is able to express himself accurately, but still struggles with interacting with others in context. His difficulty, therefore, concerns pragmatics.
I believe the answer is: testing effects
Testing effects refers to the perception long term memories tend to be increased when our brain is dedicated to retrieving a certain type of information over and over again. When studying, this tend to make people become bias and overconfident after repeating a certain topic, making them believe that they do not need to study the topic again before test.
Answer: Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial.
Explanation: I hope this helps
Answer:
The primary benefit of guaranteeing the right to a jury trial in criminal and civil cases is Option B: All of these
Explanation:
The main benefit of guaranteeing the rights to a jury trial in case of criminal and civil defendants unnecessary. They also have right to lawyer and a right to have an impartial jury. Also, in case of criminal prosecutors, they have a right to know the accusers and what kind of charges are being against them.
This helps in bringing a lot of confidence in the verdict as it is unanimous. Thus, all the statements A, C and D are true. Thus, answer is "All of these".
