15 I helped someone with this question already so I know its right
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
OMG!!!!! why don't you just SAY YOU WANT a BLEEPING REFLECTION!!!
I had to search through a slew of your questions to get clues as to what to do.
To reflect over the x axis, just negate the y term and leave the x term as it is.
M becomes (2, -1)
N becomes (-3, -1)
P becomes (-1, -4)
Answer:
A. -1
B. 1
C. 3
D. -2
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
1.
5u - 2u = 3u (diff. between longest and shortest)
3u = 87cm
1u = 87cm ÷ 3 = 29cm
5u + 4u + 2u=11u
11u = 11 x 29cm = 319cm
Ans: 319cm
2.
9u = 1350
1u = 1350 ÷ 9 = 150
6u + 5u = 11u
11u = 11 x 150 = 1650
Ans: 1650
5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
