Answer:
The federal government, under the Articles, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. The Continental Congress had borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War and could not repay their debts. States
had also fallen into debt and were raising taxes to pay off those debts
hope this helps! <3
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "implementation of the English Bill of Rights," since this put "checks" on the monarchy especially when it came to taxation. </span></span>
Royal absolutism is not an essential element of the English political tradition. However, limits to the power of the king, differing levels of representation, and protection of certain rights have been found in English political tradition.
Answer:
breaking ties with England
Explanation:
the sense of individualism that both the Great Awakening and the Enlightenment gave to the colonist eventually grew into the believe that breaking ties with England. would be in the best interest of the colonies
<em>hope it helps :)</em>
Answer:
It did not control the government well.
Explanation:
If Congress did not have non legislative powers, it did not control the government well because non legislative powers gives ultimate power to Congress such as impeachment , confirmation and investigative power. With these non legislative powers, the Congress done its work very well and strong control over officials of their government. So if Congress did not have non legislative powers, it is difficult for them to control its officials and other problems.
