Jessie’s idea is an example of "Moral objectivity".
<span>
Moral objectivism is the position that moral certainties exist independantly from sentiment.
There are a few adaptations of moral objectivism, of shifting levels of strentgth from weakest to most grounded:
Moral universalism
Moral authenticity
Moral absolutism
One general point about moral objectivism is that the position does not manage that a particular good certainties exist, nor does it suggest that any or every single moral truth are known.</span>
Sonia's concerns best align with those of the family decline perspective of family change.
The family decline perspective claim that the family is in a state of decline. The family decline perspective is the view that allowing divorces to occur more often and easily, economic decline, choosing work and school over marital settlement, having children outside marriage, having an increase in the number of people who cohabit, and allowing children to be raised in single parent households have damaged the institution of marriage.
Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
Answer:
Brainly and wikipedia sometimes
Explanation:
it helps you to understand better on Brainly and on wikipedia it sometimes give you the right and wrong answers
Answer:
Which answer best explains James Otis' views of the Revolutionary Period? ... Otis felt that representation without taxation was tyranny
Explanation:
