1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liberstina [14]
3 years ago
5

Which statement best describes the effects of the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie?

History
2 answers:
NNADVOKAT [17]3 years ago
7 0
<span>The statement that best describes the effects of the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie is: D. The Indians crossed artificial boundaries, setting the stage for conflict.
The 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie was an attempt to get the various Native American tribal nations to agree on boundaries and to stop fighting with one another, as well as allowing safe travel to settlers traveling the Oregon Trail. The treaty was broken soon after it was made, as the Lakota and Cheyenne peoples battled with the Crow, and further problems followed. A second Treaty of Fort Laramie was signed between the US government and a number of Indian nations in 1868, after the failure of that first treaty.</span>
earnstyle [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Indians crossed artificial boundaries, setting the stage for conflict.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I never understand these things no matter how many different ways they are explained to meplz help.
Talja [164]
Hello there!

Here is my OPINION/ interpretation. I may or may not be incorrect.

1). The US shouldn't sell arms (weapons) overseas because it would cause a war, and the US's goal was to stay isolated, hence the term isolationism.

Arms = weapons
Arms = body part

Selling weapons across the to Britain could cause conflicts, which could lead to war.

However, (in the first image), of they didn't sell weapons, they'd remain neutral, therefore avoiding war and its costs.

2). This cartoon MAY be trying to persuade the reader that war isn't always the solution to resolving a conflict, and that isolationism can lead to peace and unity.


Again, this is MY OPINION.

Hope this helped! :)

---------------------------------

DISCLAIMER: I am not a professional tutor or have any professional background in your subject. Please do not copy my work down, as that will only make things harder for you in the long run. Take the time to really understand this, and it'll make future problems easier. I am human, and may make mistakes, despite my best efforts. Again, I possess no professional background in your subject, so anything you do with my help will be your responsibility. Thank you for reading this, and have a wonderful day/night!

8 0
3 years ago
100 POINTS! I NEED A PARAGRAPH IN YOUR OWN WORDS! NOT COPIED!
love history [14]

First, we must note the difference. The federal system used under the USA allows the government to be branched, so that each area of the land is allowed to focus on their own problems, with a general government to help enforce, supply, and be the 'parent' of the smaller governments. In this way, it eases the tasks needed for a central government, which in turn can focus on national interest and over-sea policies. This type of government also has three branches, and with the passage of the checks-and-balances, allows the three to share equal power and to make sure that none of the branches become to powerful (in becoming a unitary government).

In a unitary system, however, the central government (national) is the only power and only gives its power to those they wish to have. The country is only governed by one branch, the executive branch, which also incorporates all other branches together too. However, there are many sub-branches, but they do not have the same rights (as they do not have checks-and-balances, as in the federal system). These rights are given by the central government, who has the final say in all things.

hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Droids at your service
wel

Answer:

ghffgh

Explanation:

hgfhgfghf

7 0
3 years ago
What were some of the main reasons that led to the government shut down
Alex
Need more information
7 0
3 years ago
Please help i've been stuck on this question for so long
zzz [600]

Answer:

The correct answer is B.

Explanation:

The answer is self-explanatory. That is the order in which events occurred.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Could a citizens' militia possibly be effective against an attempt<br> to install a dictator?
    10·1 answer
  • Who was the ruling class in Sparta?​
    15·1 answer
  • What did the launch of spoon tick in the Soviet Union and the establishment of the national Aeronautics and Space Administration
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the colony of Rhode Island founded in the early 1600s? A) as a protest to British taxes B) because of civil war in Virgi
    11·2 answers
  • Help me with this question please ⚠️⚠️
    11·1 answer
  • Which sentence from the section supports the conclusion that Shakespeare helped to shape the English language?
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPP!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING, 1960-1968 (in billions of dollars)
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it important to understand how the Constitution guarded against tyranny? Why is it important today?
    6·1 answer
  • What change did and what state the same during the American revolution
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!