Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Consumer rights and consumer protection<span> law provides a way for individuals to fight back against abusive business practices.</span>
What Mark's response to what happened to Allison illustrates is an attribution bias. Attribution is giving cognitive inferences why an event happened. However, errors in the attribution process are also conceived. One of these is the attribution bias. Attribution bias is our tendency to attribute the behavior of other people to something personal rather than to their situation. It is a systemic error where we tend to overlook the impact of situations. Just like what Mark perceived of the car accident. He attributed blame to Allison being absent-minded.
C. Al-Queda took over also known as ISIS
