Answer:
Positive,
Explanation:
Although the political views of Thomas Jefferson were very different from those of Washington, Jefferson agreed that isolation and neutrality were the most beneficial course for the United States.
Through time they changed it based on problems on hand, and the changes through time.
Sorry if that's not a sutable answer
Yes.
Even though democracy in theory must be something almost completely free of influence, all the influence of the people who have more power in society is still great, and it increases as social inequality grows
In situations where the population is in favor of deconcentrating income and wealth, this will has not found support in the political arena. On the one hand, there are those who insist on denying the problem, stating that the growth of social inequality does not produce adverse effects for society; on the other, there are those who declare that nothing can be done about the matter, since the culprits would be the <u>“market forces”</u>, neutral and impersonal economic mechanisms.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice "The Goths established a new, centralized government that controlled all Roman territory."
The Sack of Rome occurred on August 24, 410. The city was attacked by theVisigoths<span> led by </span>King Alaric<span>. At that time, Rome was no longer the capital of the Western Roman Empire, having been replaced in that position by Ravenna in 402.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
