I will answer the three options based on different kind of perspective of a person:
- I would chose the first option to escape and flee with my family to another part of Africa if my co-workers wouldn't agree with me in Options 2 or 3. It would be a personal option to escape because its for my own's best self-interest to survive in the world and avoid punishment.
- I would chose the second option to appeal to the missionaries or the authorities even the king if the work crew also agreed and have the same view of what's happening and in order to avoid a bloody and chaotic movement for reforms.
- I would only chose the last option to take arms if it is necessary and peaceful solution has failed. Also this is only possible if everyone in the work crew has the same views with me and lost hope for a peaceful reforms.
The fact that Japan is a very small island nation has always made it hard for them to have enough domestic natural resources, which has historically meant that they have elected powerful leaders who have supported going to war with larger countries, such as China and Russia, in order to gain more territory.
Answer:These land grants were made by Congress to four types of recipients: the states; business corporations; veterans and their dependents; and farmer-settlers
Brainliest Plz :)
Yes. Because during the war the South was severely unable to mass produce weapons and other goods like the North could. Which would also hinder the South ability to fight