Answer:
7.1 I am pretty sure okay cya
Firstly, we need to know the price of the TV after the 110$ increase.
$165 x 1.10 = $181.50
[This is an increase of $16.50]
[1.10 is the equivalent of 110%. 1 being 100% and the .10 being 10%]
Now for the sales tax. We apply a similar method.
$181.50 x 0.065 = $11.79
6.5% of $181.50 is $11.79, so we add the two together to find the final cost.
The final cost of the TV is $193.29
For this case we must resolve the following inequality:
Adding 7 to both sides of the inequality:
Different signs are subtracted and the major sign is placed.
Thus, the solution is given by all the values of "x" less than -5.
The solution set is: (-∞, - 5)
Answer:
See attached image
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<em>The answer resides in the explanation.</em>
<em>Pls rate as brainliest </em>
Step-by-step explanation:
The predicted useful life of a brand A cutting tool when the speed is 45 meters per minute is 1.2 to 5.5 hours.
The predicted useful life of a brand B cutting tool when the speed is 45 meters per minute is 3.4 to 5.4 hours.
The prediction interval for brand A is larger than the prediction interval for brand B because the estimated standard error of y^ is different for the two intervals.
The prediction intervals are both larger than the corresponding confidence intervals.
The standard error for the estimated mean value of y is smaller than the standard error for the predicted value of y.
The predicted useful life of a brand A cutting tool that is operated at 100 meters per minute is -0.59 hours
The actual predicted useful life of a brand A cutting tool when the speed is 100 meters per minute is 0.0 to 2.3 hours.
