This seems to be an opinion based question, I will provide you with both a yes and no response with arguments to support it and you can choose which one best suites your beliefs:
Yes, the benefits of raising the minimum wage outweigh the drawbacks. By raising the minimum wage you increase the quality of life for workers. Many full time workers are unable to afford housing or groceries in this economy on the minimum wage. At $7.25/hour and 40hrs/week is $290 before taxes. This is not enough income to cover the basic costs of living in most places. If people earned more money they would have more money to spend and corporations would profit from an increase in sales. Also, workers wouldn't have to depend so much on government services such as food stamps and section 8 housing assistance because they would be able to support their families with their own income. This would free up funds for government to provide more for the school systems, better healthcare and/or infrastructure.
No, the benefits of an increased minimum wage would not outweigh the drawbacks. The drawbacks of a higher minimum wage are significant because they most directly effect small business owners. The "mom and pop shop" owners depend on paying low salaries in order to keep their doors open. If they were forced to increase their pay rates, by what many minimum wage supporters suggest: more than double, they would not be able to afford employees to keep their doors open. Also, government agencies would be forced to pay their low-level workers as much as $15/hr which could become a tax burden on the citizens who pay for the salaries of all government employees. Raising the minimum wage would be detrimental to the economy because small companies and the government could not afford to support the salaries and benefits of their workers.
Answer:
The method is known as systematic desensitization therapy, and incorporates in vivo exposure.
Explanation:
The systematic desensitization therapy it's a behavior therapy that was first applied by Dr. Joseph Wolpe, a South African psychiatrist as a way to deal with people's phobias.
The first step is learning relaxation and breathing techniques, which may include meditation.
Then a fear hierarchy is created as stated in your question. The patient goes on a scale from least feared scenarios, such as thinking about the feared object/animal, to the most feared scenarios, such as physical contact.
In Vivo exposure, means that the patient will be directly exposed to the object of his/her phobia. It is the opposite of In Vitro exposure, in which the patient will only imagine the phobic stimulus, and there is no direct contact or exposure.
Answer:
The correct answer is c) living in a rural area.
Explanation:
When talking about a social context, reference is made to the environment where a person lives and is where the individual develops his interaction with society, where he learns customs and behavior.
The social context will tell us a lot about how the person will develop since human behavior is closely related to the social context.
Social context will influence <em>the actions </em>that the person performs. For example, in this case, the people who live in a rural have different customs than the people who live in an urban area; many times, this simple detail causes people to have different aspirations and develop differently.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
<span>If a motor does not turn, the rotor/and or the stator current needs to be increased to increase the magnetic force. Motor damage/or failure is likely if you much exceed the design current for the motor. Options are reduce the torque required by the load and/or replace the motor with one with more starting torque.</span>
On October 1, 1949, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong declared the creation of the People's Republic of China (PRC)
