Answer:
2.foreingers were not allowed
Explanation:
They are past tense verbs, which are not often used in narrative essays.
Answer:
The letter is below:
Dear mom:
I know that mentioned you that I would come back to home after to complete my mandatory time in the army, but we lost in front of the Confederate Army, and I feel that this war could change the country and the future of the people here, my spirit like American and my patriotism doesn't let me go home waiting the new recruits can do the feat that we didn't despite our experience, by this reason I decided reenlisting in the army. Please don't hate me, I'll do all in my hands to come back to the house and looking for a wife, as you ever wanted, to live a normal life in the farm and be near to you.
With love,
...
Explanation:
In the letter <u>I used the patriotism and the American spirit, two strong feelings for the soldiers in war moments, they are usually the feelings that most accompany the soldiers and give them the courage to face terrible eventualities such as war</u>, in addition to allowing them to endure trauma due to all the fateful scenes that are lived there.
In order for Tuvan musicians to adapt their performance in
their new performance by having to sing a wide variety of musical forms, in
this way, they may be able to have versions that are extended to their
traditional songs that they often sang.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain example (updated by Professor Sandel to the Michael Jordan example) is supposed to illustrate that "liberty upsets patterns and, therefore, the entitlement conception of justice requires illegitimate restrictions of liberty. This applies to justice in holdings and justice in transfer.
American professor Robert Nozick, known for its interesting work at Harvard University, was a justice researcher and theorist who studied libertarian rights and the role of justice in modern society.
In 1974, he wrote the influential book called "Anarchy, State and Utopia," in which he defended the existence of a non-interventional state that granted liberties to citizens with minimal or none interference in the lives of people.
