Answer:
to escape being eaten by the whale
Explanation:
Stute Fish was the last fish in the sea, because the whale devoured everyone else. He knew it would be his next meal and so he directed all of his actions to protect him. In this case, we can say that the fish decided to hide behind the whale's ear so as not to be seen by it and eventually eaten and when she said she was hungry, he suggested that she taste the taste of another animal, man, because so he would not be devoured.
In other words, we can say that the fish's actions were motivated by the desire to escape being eaten by the whale.
Answer:
Goldilocks went to the Bears' house yesterday.
I'm going to tidy my room tomorrow.
I saw Sally today.
I will call you later.
I have to leave now.
Explanation:
A subordinating conjunction is a word or phrase that links a dependent clause to an independent clause. ... A dependent clause, also known as a subordinate clause, is a clause with two specific qualities.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
Answer: Fascination
Explanation: its all in someone minds
