Graham received secondary reinforcement when ____.

Social Studies

1 answer:

Julli [10]3 years ago

4 0

The answer is: c. his mother gave him his allowance for doing his chores

Secondary reinforcement refers to something that could influence other people to do a certain behavior that come from other thing beside their own will.

When a mother gives allowance for his chores, it could make the children much more likely to do the chores. But the increase in likelihood does not come from the children's will, but from the children's intent to get the money,.

You might be interested in

I WILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST AND THANKS AND 5 STARS

Yuri [45]

The answer would be c plz mark me as brainliest

5 0

3 years ago

You had several of your son's friends over last night for a sleepover. while dropping off their child, one of the parents did

Andrew [12]

Is insurance an answer

4 0

3 years ago

In the eighteenth century, under what circumstances were women given a right to make their voice heard and participate in popula

taurus [48]

Answer:

The answer is stated below.

Explanation:

During the eighteenth century, women couldn't bring a lawsuit, she couldn't make a contract or own property. Women in any state were unable to vote or hold office, had no access to higher education, and were excluded from technical occupations. Law in the United States embraced the idea that a woman except her husband had no legal identity. With these backgrounds, picture raised their grievances against the domestic issues.

4 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast 1920 movies to today's world

lesya692 [45]

Movies today have more acting involved. It’s also more modern. Back in the day they talked a certain way for the cameras and girls weren’t as much written in. Women now have a bigger role. The black and white things. Also movies now go deeper and more dramatic. More action and more genres

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Pam graduates from law school and gets a position in a law firm at four times her current income. At the same time the price of

Hoochie [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Pam is not violating the law of demand. The law of demand suggests that the supply of a product varies with demand. When demand increases, price increases, when demand decreases, price decreases. Notice that Pam has decreased hamburger consumption, meaning it has contributed to the decrease in demand. If the demand for hamburgers has decreased, it is only natural that the price of hamburgers will decrease. It should be noted that even if the hamburger price had risen and Pam no longer consumed hamburgers, the law of demand would still not be violated. This is because the law of demand takes into account aggregate demand (from all consumers) rather than individual demand. So Pam could have stopped eating hamburger as a matter of preference for another item.

5 0

3 years ago