Answer:
Will cheer
Explanation:
The passage in future tense
Answer:
The trolley problem is a series of thought experiments in ethics and psychology, involving stylized ethical dilemmas of whether to sacrifice one person to save a larger number. Opinions on the ethics of each scenario turn out to be sensitive to details of the story that may seem immaterial to the abstract dilemma. The question of formulating a general principle that can account for the differing moral intuitions in the different variants of the story was dubbed the "trolley problem" in a 1976 philosophy paper by Judith Jarvis Thomson.
Explanation:
Nevertheless or in other words it also means however
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
it’s D. Because the tone is pretty much the attitude.
Answer:
1. if we didn't save money, eventually we wouldn't have any. Therefore we wouldn't be able to buy food or water. Because we can't afford anything we would die. (Sad, but true.)
2. Savings can help us a lot. if we don't save and go blow a bunch of money then when we need to pay bills and such we won't have enough. Then you could lose your house and more because you didn't pay.
3. There are a lot of emergencies that happen. If no one ever saved then you might find yourself in a life or death situation, but don't have money and therefore lose a lot.
4. If you didn't save then someone comes and demolishes your car then your out of luck, but if you save and prepare for the future then it would still be a big loss, but you can still go get a new car and still be able to travel to places you need.
5. if we never save then we could find ourselves in a lot of trouble. There are a number of things that could happen. If we save we can also save ourselves from a lot of trouble.
Explanation:
