Shifting the focus to how the author needs his mother's support at the end of the argument might be considered an example of false causation fallacy.
Explanation:
In case of false causation the causes of the fallacies are incorrectly identified. In this case although one event is related to another event and the events take place at the same time . Although if the events are talking place at the same time but the events are not connected to each other. In case of false fallacy real relationship do not exist between the variables . One of the example of false causation is that whenever I go to the the bed at night for sleep , sun also goes down as well.
Answer:
My teacher assigned <u>much</u><u> </u>reading over the summer
Answer: At some point in everyone's life we’ve been pure pressured to do something. Whether we like it or not we will have to make a decision when the opportunity presents itself. We have to choose between right and wrong. Peer pressure in teens is particularly interesting because teens make decisions with a brain that isn’t fully developed. Unlike an adult’s brain, a teens brain has many changes to undergo some of which shape the way how teens problem solve, interact, and understand the environment around them. During these critical stages of a young adults life it is extremely important that they are able to interact and experiment with the world around them. It is important to point out that a teen should experiment in a safe and positive environment. Peer pressure can be a good and bad thing depending on what an individual is being pressured to do. For example, if a teen is being pressured by five of his or her friends to walk a 6k fun run assuming the individual is in good health and a good state of mind this wouldn’t really be considered peer pressure it would be considered more along the lines as motivation. On the other hand, if a teen is pressured to steal an item from a store then that’s when it crosses the line. Peer pressure in most cases is not a good thing and you should always be aware of the consequences of your actions. There are many ways to cope with this pressure the best advice I can give you is the listen and decide the situation. Listen to what is being asked of you to do. Then, the question is this something I am capable of doing or should I do it. Lastly, decide based off of the information you have gathered should you or should you not do it. What are some consequences of my actions.
This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.
For those who may think I exaggerate the contrast between the former river canyon and the present man-made impoundment, I suggest a trip on Lake Powell followed immediately by another boat trip on the river below the dam. Take a boat from Lee's Ferry up the river to within sight of the dam, then shut off the motor and allow yourself the rare delight of a quiet, effortless drifting down the stream. ln that twelve-mile stretch of living green, singing birds, flowing water and untarnished canyon walls — sights and sounds a million years older and infinitely lovelier than the roar of motorboats — you will rediscover a small and imperfect sampling of the kind of experience that was taken away from everybody when the oligarch and politicians condemned our river for purposes of their own.
Which rhetorical technique is Abbey using in the underlined section of this excerpt?
A. Pathos
B. Ethos
C. Logos
D. Ad hominem
Answer: A. Pathos
Explanation:
Pathos is a rhetorical technique that appeals to an audience's emotions. To persuade them, an argument that creates an emotional reaction is made. Especially used in literature to spark specific feelings from readers. In this case, Abbey applies it by describing the "living green, singing birds" and how lovely the "sights and sounds" of the river are in order to make her point.
