Answer:
$3,208
Explanation:
The computation of the future value is shown below;
As we know that
Future valie = Present value × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
where
Present value is $2,500
Rate of interest = 2.5% ÷ 4 = 0.625%
And, the time period is = 10 × 4 = 40
So, the future value is
= $2,500 × (1 + 0.625%)^40
= $3,208
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: second-degree price discrimination.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term of price discrimination, in marketing and economics, refers to the action of charge different prices to different consumers for the same product that do not vary in quality. This concept states fourth differents degrees in order to use the most beneficial strategy to one's company.
To continue,<em> the second-degree price discrimination</em> establishes that companies price products differently based on the preferences of various groups of consumers and furthermore it is very common to <u>apply this type of discrimination through quantity discounts</u> and to add an example, is very common to use this strategy in <u>warehouse retailers such as Costco.</u>
When the intervention rises the price stage of goods, then the incentive to supply extra desires increases and consequently growing manufacturers' surplus. So policy market can motivate both client and producer surplus.
A tax causes consumer surplus and producer surplus (earnings) to fall.. some of those losses are captured inside the tax, however, there may be a loss captured with the aid of no celebration—the value of the devices that could be exchanged had been there no tax. those lost gains from trade are called deadweight losses.
For each monetary transaction, there can be both producer surplus (or profit) and client surplus. The mixture–or blended–a surplus is called the economic surplus.
Learn more about policy market here: brainly.com/question/25754149
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. Budgetary.
Explanation:
They are used to do that because the range of variance could be from -10% to +20%.
Although this, it is not accurate enough to provide a solid basis for a firm commitment because it only represents an approximation of what is need to be done.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
Lowa should produce corn; Nebraska should produce Wheat
Explanation:
Two states: Iowa and Nebraska
Same two goods are produced by both of them: Corn and wheat
For lowa,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = 3 bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of wheat
For Nebraska,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = 3 bushels of wheat
According to the concept of comparative advantage, a country is exporting the commodity in which it has a comparative advantage and a country has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity is lower than the other country.
In our case, lowa should producing and exporting corn because the opportunity cost of producing corn is lower than the Nebraska and on the other hand, Nebraska should producing and exporting wheat because the opportunity cost of producing wheat is lower than the lowa.
