Yes, it is true that during the Qin Dynasty, silk became a product in such high demand that one punishment for revealing the secret of how it was made was death, since silk was such an important commodity when it came to GDP and the well-being of thousands of citizens.
Answer:
There you go
Explanation:
Although France (empire/people) was similar to England (empire/people) in that they both were motivated by trade and colonization, they were different in that France (empire/people) had/was/began (other verbs are possible) collapse due to the conflicts with the English while England (empire/people) had/was/began (other verbs are possible) prospering becoming the world's dominant country.
Concerning their political steps to growing their empire (general topic from chart), Spain (empire/people) was/were very similar to Netherlands (empire/people) in that both had/was/began (other verbs are possible) created provinces and built localized governments. However, their differences were more pronounced regarding their economic results (general topic from chart), in that Netherlands (empire/people) had/was/began (other verbs are possible) been focusing more on spice trade while Spain (empire/people) had/was/began (other verbs are possible) focusing more on silver and slave trade.
Mughal (empire/people) was/were different from Ottomans (empire/people) in that Mughal (empire/people) had/was/began (other verbs are possible) a huge declined in power and loss of territory while the Ottomans (empire/people) had/was/began (other verbs are possible) increased to size of their empire taking control of Europeans and Asian trade routes through land and sea. However, they were similar in that they used their military to expand their empires and increase trade access, and to gain power (specifics from general topic from chart).
I believe it is an example of answer choice D promoting the general wellfare!
Explanation:
Athough initially disregarded by the great powers of Europe, the Monroe Doctrine became a mainstay of U.S. foreign policy . In 1823 U.S. President James monroe proclaimed the U.S. protector of the western Hemispere by forbidding European powers from colonizing additional territories in the Americas.
Answer:
...“The father of modern economics supported a limited role for government. Mark Skousen writes in "The Making of Modern Economics", Adam Smith believed that, "Government should limit its activities to administer justice, enforcing private property rights, and defending the nation against aggression." The point is that the farther a government gets away from this limited role, the more that government strays from the ideal path... How this issue is handled will decide whether the country can more closely follow Adam Smith's prescription for growth and wealth creation or move farther away from it.”
Jacob Viner addressed the laissez-faire attribution to Adam Smith in 1928...
Here is a list of appropriate activities for government, which goes way, way beyond Mark Skousen’s extremely limited – and vague – 'ideal' government. That ... he goes on to attribute his ‘ideal’ list to Adam Smith ... is not alright.In fact, its downright deceitful, for which there is no excuse of ignorance (before attributing the limited ideal to Adam Smith we assume, as scholars must, that Skousen read Wealth Of Nations and noted what Smith actually identified as the appropriate roles of government in the mid-18th century).
