1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol [13]
3 years ago
12

1. Which system of government has one person who rule?

History
2 answers:
ioda3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Monarchy Governments

Explanation:

One personnel, Queen, or King, rules over all in the country with the help of and averagely small board, or council, to help with the choices and to get the people's ideas and interests.

Anna35 [415]3 years ago
5 0

A Monarchy government is a government that has one person who rules ex. king, Queen, etc.

You might be interested in
Consider what you have learned about the suffrage
Tresset [83]

Answer: this viewpoint opposes suffarage

Explanation: B

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Over time, historians have changed the ways they study the past because
geniusboy [140]
B. Started to explore history though the perspectives of many different groups.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The early nineteenth century was an era of widespread urban unrest and mob violence, which led local leaders to realize that a m
Mice21 [21]

Correct answer is "a. True".

Urban police systems began to emerge throughout Europe and especially in France over the preceding centuries, it was in the early 1800s however that they took their modern conception and were adopted in the United Kingdom, which up to then had been resilient to an idea that it saw as an oppressive foreign import. The change in perception was a consequence of severe unrest and lawlessness in the cities, as documented in the classical Charles Dickens book A Tale of Two Cities. This process culminated with the passage of the Metropolitan Police act of 1829, which produced the world's first modern and professional police force.

7 0
4 years ago
Why might a state argue that an unfunded mandate violates its rights?
Aleksandr [31]
A <span>state might argue that an unfunded mandate violates its rights because the Constitution ensures that all powers not specifically given to the federal government are maintained by the individual states. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Hello need help again txsss
dem82 [27]

Explanation:

option B is correct

hope it helps you

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to the Declaration of Independence, when a government works against the rights of the people, what are the people allo
    14·1 answer
  • How did near by rivers and deserts affect the development of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt?
    8·1 answer
  • How did governments pay for the war ww1?
    14·1 answer
  • Who should not have been happy during the 4th period of expansion with Rome plzz answer asap instant brainliest for anyone no jo
    7·1 answer
  • Which BEST illustrates the principle of checks and balances? A) the taxing power of states B) the military powers of the preside
    6·2 answers
  • How was crime and punishment in the year 999
    15·1 answer
  • Which advantages did the British have over the colonists during the Amerlcan war for Independence?​
    13·1 answer
  •  Write a comparison- contrast paragraph on the economies of Spain and the Netherlands around 1600.
    12·1 answer
  • 2.
    7·2 answers
  • All prehistoric paintings have been found in
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!