1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mamaluj [8]
3 years ago
13

Historically the Huang He has also been known as the river of sorrows because

History
1 answer:
spin [16.1K]3 years ago
5 0
Floods destroy crops.
You might be interested in
Question 8 of 30
Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

d exchange rates are always fluctating

7 0
3 years ago
(PLZ ANSWER ASAP) A Texas History teacher wrote these bullet points on the whiteboard. What was the most likely topic of discuss
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

wait bilboard are you still in school?Anyways it could have been how Texans improved and modified their environment.

Explanation:

Hope this helped and sorry its late.

4 0
3 years ago
Why is the rule of King Louis XIV regarded as the best example of absolutism in the seventeenth century?
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

He ruled with absolute power because all of the duties of the government lays only to him. (Absolute monarchy)

4 0
3 years ago
What should the outcome of the Revolutionary War be? Who should win and how should the losing side be handled?
gladu [14]

Answer:

In my opinion the Patriots should have won, because they were fighting for their natural rights, against monarchy that was subduing them and did not allow them to express their opinion. Besides winning, new state should emerge and British governance over the former colonies should have ended.

Explanation:

British colonial rule in North America was oppressive and colonists practically had no opportunity to express what bothered them. That is why they decided to start revolution that will lead them to independence.

Although war should not be a solution war anything it is obvious that this was the last solution that colonists decided to take upon.

6 0
3 years ago
Pol Pot, Joseph Stalin, and Slobodan Milosevic were similar in that each leader supported actions that
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

resulted in genocides

Explanation:

Pol Pot, Stalin, and Milosevic are all infamous leaders that supported and organized actions that resulted in genocides. All of them did it in their own unique way, but the end result was devastating in all scenarios. Pol Pot was killing the people in his own country, making a genocide over the other ethnic groups, and then turning on his own people as well. Stalin performed genocides in pretty much all possible ways in the Soviet Union, from murdering, separation, displacement, putting people in work camps in Siberia. Milosevic opened up a war with the Croatians and the Muslims in Bosnia, murdering thousands of innocent people just because of their ethnicity or religion.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lesson 4: plateau and coastal regions
    14·1 answer
  • The time period after the War of 1812, which saw only one political party was called what?
    12·1 answer
  • Feudalism started in Northern Europe and spread throughout the continent, but was strongest in
    13·2 answers
  • The religion of Ancient China involving the return of ethics and moral values is known as A.Confucianism. B.Taoism. C.Hinduism.
    6·2 answers
  • How would the political process be different without political parties?
    6·2 answers
  • By buying on the installment plan,
    13·1 answer
  • I really need someone to answer this question.​
    15·2 answers
  • Lowell, Massachusetts was known
    6·1 answer
  • What contributed to the assasination of franz ferdinand
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you think Adolf hitler wanted to control every aspect of German life?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!