Answer:
D. asymmetric information.
Explanation:
Owners of defective used cars have more information about the condition of their vehicles than potential buyers of those used cars. This is an example of an asymmetric information.
An asymmetric information can be defined as a situation wherein there's an imperfect flow of information or knowledge between the buyer and the seller of a product; sellers having more knowledge than the buyer of a product.
Answer:
$4.00
Explanation:
To calculate the approximate overhead cost per unit of product A1 under activity - based costing we have it as
Activity 1 allocated to Product B2 line we have as
$48,000 × 4,800/6,000
= $38,400
Activity 2 allocated to Product B2 line we have it as
= $63,000 × 4,760/7,000
= $42,840
Activity 3 allocated to Product B2 line we have it as
=$80,000 × 800/8,000
= $8,000
Total overhead allocated to Product B2 = $89,240
Overhead per unit of Product B2: $89,240/22,310 = $4.00
As our overhead unit of product
Answer:
C) Lease payments for office space
Explanation:
The fixed cost is the cost that remains fixed whether the production level changes or not
So as per the given choices, the option c would be selected i.e. lease payment made for office space as it would be independent with respect to the quantity generated also it would be paid even there is no production take place
Therefore the option c is correct
Answer:
c. $8.05
Explanation:
Calculation to determine What is the value of this stock at a required return of 16.4 percent
First step is to calculate the P2
P2 = ($1.35/.164)
P2= $8.23
Now let calculate the value of the stock
P0 = [$1.23 /1.164] + [($1.25 + 8.23)/1.164^2]
P0 = $8.05
Therefore the value of this stock at a required return of 16.4 percent is $8.05
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Accept the USA distributor demand. It is even better for Tetsu compared to Japan.
Explanation:
Considering both the distributors in Japan and the U.S. request a 20% margin for the retails of Tetsu's devices, accepting the offer of the U.S. company represents a good deal. Businesses are not handled the same in Japan and the U.S. Both countries have different policies. Tetsu must consider that the U.S. is a bigger market and that its devices are imported in the U.S., implying there could be tariffs imposed. Tough, if the U.S. distributor requests the same margin a Japanese distributor does to start businesses, <em>the deal will be in Tetsu's favor</em>.