1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepan [7]
3 years ago
8

How might life be different today if humans had stepped into the fossil record sooner?

History
1 answer:
RSB [31]3 years ago
5 0

We can only theorize about how the life would be if the humans appeared earlier on the Earth, as we can not create a perfect and accurate picture of how would the things have been.

If the humans were developing in the same manner as we had, than we can say that the humans would have been much more advanced. The technology would have much better, probably missions to the other planets would have been regular. The population would probably be higher, with most of the population being concentrated in highly advanced megalopolises.

The environment though would probably be in a terrible condition, with enormous loss in biodiversity across the globe, decline in the forests, and much emptier (with life) oceans. On the other hand, there's every chance that with the more advanced technology multiple animals and plants would have been resurrected, even some extinct very long time ago.

You might be interested in
Which invention provided instant communication and information to a massive audience for the first time?
Mashutka [201]

Answer:

The invention of television and video

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which of these states is located in the area acquired by the U.S. in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo?
Margarita [4]
Gained New Mexico and California.
4 0
3 years ago
Según David Ricardo, el proceso productivo no es un proceso natural ya que la naturaleza no es generosa con el hombre, a no ser
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

Según David Ricardo, el proceso productivo no es un proceso natural ya que la naturaleza no es generosa con el hombre, a no ser que este la convierta en productiva y la adecue a sus intereses. En otras palabras, la renta surgía en un país no a causa de la liberalidad de la naturaleza sino de la avaricia, por lo tanto, la riqueza implicaba la pobreza de unos y el enriquecimiento de otros. Lo anterior significa que la acumulación de capital no es el nacimiento de una nueva riqueza sino el empobrecimiento de otros, porque  LO QUE GANABAN LOS TERRATENIENTES EN LA TIERRA LO PERDÍAN QUIENES TRABAJABAN EN ELLA.

Explanation:

David Ricardo fue un economista británico. Quizás su contribución más importante a la ciencia económica fue la ley de la ventaja comparativa, un argumento fundamental a favor del libre comercio entre países. Ricardo argumentó que el comercio (o intercambio) era beneficioso para ambas partes involucradas, incluso si una de las partes (por ejemplo, un país rico en recursos) era más productivo en cada área que su socio comercial (por ejemplo, un país pobre en recursos), siempre que ambas partes se concentraran en eso actividades donde tenían una ventaja relativa de productividad.

Ahora bien, estas ventajas no eran equitativamente distribuidas entre sus productores a distintos niveles: según su teoría de la renta diferencial, la renta de la producción económica se distribuía de forma desigual, siendo mayor para quien menos producía (el terrateniente), mientras el trabajador, que era el principal productor de riqueza, recibía una pequeña porción de esta. De esta forma, Ricardo interpretaba la renta de la tierra como el principal factor de riqueza de su época.

4 0
3 years ago
The Agricultural Revolution directly resulted in _________________________________ and __________________________________.
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

The Agricultural Revolution directly increased the quality of life and population.

Explanation:

The agricultural revolution was an industrialist movement in England in the eighteenth century. It generated new agricultural techniques that made agriculture more profitable and also increased its practice. The direct result was that people had more revenue because they farmed more from the land. thus, they were able to increase their quality of life and the population grew as a result. Also, many farmers left their farms to venture into the cities.

5 0
4 years ago
In this type of government, the institutions of the state are governed as a single unit, with one constitutionally created legis
Goryan [66]
Democracy is the  type of government where the institutions of the state are governed as a single unit, with one constitutionally created legislature. It is a <span>government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was the ruler of the byzantine empire in 800 ce
    10·1 answer
  • How you know that fort henry and fort donelson were confederate forts
    8·1 answer
  • Who has the power to fund the army and navy, the congress or the president?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following organizations has encouraged free trade, increased economic interdependence, and lessened travel restrict
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the emancipation proclamation and the general order 143 were important during the civil war
    10·1 answer
  • Who was the first people to go to north carolina?
    14·1 answer
  • A
    13·1 answer
  • If the United States is a net importer of a product that is being subsidized or dumped by Japan, not only do U.S. consumers gain
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Emancipation Proclamation turn the British public opinion against the South?
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram on the fall of the Western Roman Empire?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!