All categories

3 years ago

What were the positive and negative aspects to Harding’s laissez-faire approach?

1 answer:

7 0

one advantage to this philosophy is that businesses faced fewer government rules and regulations. this allowes businesses to do many things. often rules and regulations add tothe costs that business faces. sometimes, rules and regulations make it harder to do business activities. when businesses have fewer rules and regulations they are generally willing to take more risks and to invest in the economy. with fewer rules and regulations, businesses have a big incentive to try to maximize profits.

a disadvantage of this policy is that businesses may engage in risky behaviors that could lead to future economic problems. in the 1920s, there were few rules and regulations on banks and on the investiment industry. to much money was being loaned to individuals and people could buy stocks woth only a small down payment. banks were also free to invest in the stock market. when the stock market crashed, many people and banks were financially ruined.

You might be interested in

Imagine that time travel exists. what would surprise a knowledgeable observer in the period from 500 to 1000

Sliva [168]

Answer and explanation;

Several changes would undoubtedly have surprised a knowledgeable observer, including;

- the emergence of Islam;

- the revival of China and Western Europe;

-the collapse of the Byzantine Empire;

-the emergence of Russia and the spread of Christianity into that region;

-the emergence of states in Southeast Asia;

-the emergence of Japan;

-the emergence of powerful empires in West Africa.

However, some features would still be recognizable, such as;

- the persistence of Paleolithic, agricultural village, and herding societies;

-the continuance, albeit at a more intense rate, of long-distance commerce and exchange;

-the persistence of broad cultural traditions, especially in the Mesoamerican, Andean, Chinese, European, and Indian civilizations.

4 0

3 years ago

• Should the US assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

The united states does not participate in political assassinations but yes the U.S should assassinate suspected terrorist because it already does.

Explanation:

The form for this is often an air strike or a black ops in a counter- terrorism operation.

8 0

3 years ago

Compare and Contrast the social, political, and religious worlds of the Americas and Oceania. In what ways were they similar? In

Snowcat [4.5K]

Americas and Oceania were similar in the way that first they both could developed experienced agricultural practices. Second, they could have their own distinct architecture, art and some other cultural characteristics with any influence from the outside. Third, some external groups sustained their nomadic hunter.-gathering lifestyle. And finally, both of them faced dangers of overpopulation and exposed of diseases they had never been exposed to. They both were different just because they developed large sophisticated societies in isolation merely.

6 0

3 years ago

Two of johnson's great legislative accomplishments were:_____.

aleksandrvk [35]

Two of johnson's great legislative accomplishments were: c. civil rights Act.

After taking office, he won significant tax cuts, the Clean Air Act, and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After the 1964 election, Johnson passed even broader reforms. The 1965 Social Security Reform created two state health care programs: Medicare and Medicaid.

This pivotal act was followed by the Higher Education Act of 1965, which increased federal funding for colleges and universities, created student scholarships and soft loans, and placed teachers in impoverished areas of the United States. A National Teachers Association was established for the state.

Learn more about civil rights Act. here: brainly.com/question/10584148

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

What are some of the challenges the federal and state governments face in trying to implement a fair tax system?. Give at least

vekshin1

<span>(1) No two people agree on just what would be "fair".

(2) Even if there were agreement, the people with political clout have no reason to want a "fair" system; they want a system that benefits them. There is a reason the Republicans have been pushing through tax cuts for the rich.

(3) The tax "system" includes all the taxes: local, state, and federal. If you want the entire system to be fair, it has to be changed as a whole, not piece by piece. And that would make it hard to start and hard to maintain (any change in tax rates would also have to be coordinated) </span>

8 0

3 years ago