The reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not implementing high taxes on cigarettes, would have a social advantage. The article strongly postulates that raising the taxes on cigarettes would have more than one benefit for smokers. On the other hand, the listening adamantly opposed that forcing high taxes on cigarettes would benefit smokers, and she believes it has more drawbacks. Its fine hope it is helpful and plz mark brainliest.
I would choose options (A) providing facts and (D) using deductive reasoning. Since the deductive reasoning is based on premises (providing fact would be the action needed) for its operation. When we reason deductively, we use known facts to arrive at logical conclusions that we know are true.
Answer: C. is the correct answer
“in an attempt to save the Chicago Tribune building, men stayed in the roof for as long as possible during the fire, keeping it wet and stamping out cinders.”
Explanation:
i took the test
