Answer:
the answer is B Assimilation
Explanation:
Forced assimilation is an involuntary process of cultural assimilation of religious or ethnic minority groups during which they are forced to adopt language, identity, norms, mores, customs, traditions, values, mentality, perceptions, way of life, and often religion and ideology of established and generally larger.
In the United States, during the great war, the American government did burn most German books. In the United States and Canada, forced assimilation had been practiced against indigenous peoples through the Indian residential school system and Indian boarding schools.
Forced assimilation is rarely successful, and it generally has enduring negative consequences for the recipient culture. Voluntary assimilation, albeit usually effected under pressure from the dominant culture, has also been prevalent in the historical record.
Rhineland - Not aggressive - Anschluss (Austria) - Quite aggressive Czech - VERY AGGRESSIVE (Demands war if not given Sudetenland/Czechoslovakia)
look at a picture and then paint it how you want. One thing to know is that it doesn't matter what others think as long as you like it.
Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
