One unfortunate result of the scientifically unsupported contention that vaccinations play a major role in the development of au
tism spectrum disorder is that in the first half of 2008, rates of ______ cases in the United States doubled as compared to the rates observed between 2000 and 2007.
One unfortunate result of the scientifically unsupported contention that vaccinations play a major role in the development of autism spectrum disorder is that in the first half of 2008, rates of measles cases in the United States doubled as compared to the rates observed between 2000 and 2007.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Though the contention was not supported with scientific findings and was only based on general observation, the results of the contention clearly exhibited that the vaccination has failed as there was an increase in cases with measles contraction.
Merely for the fact that the contention lacks scientific support, it was not given enough emphasis and means and methods other than what the contention suggested were implemented to address the problem.
They are attacking immigrants from a personal point of view.
Stewart and Hodgman use the straw man fallacy to make their case more solid. They explain that immigrants are dangerous people who bring violence and sickness, then they change positions and show how innocent the hosts are and are not eligible for the programs that immigrants bring.
Yes, they use common beliefs. If the leprosy epidemic erupts, it will most likely endanger Americans' fingers. Or comments that shock Americans on leprosy in America. But we have to remember that this show is a comedy. The chart shown is certainly not for any decision. The facts are not correct for cases of leprosy.
Stewart and Hodgman rightly criticize the general and the hypocritical and hypocritical about immigration. This problem is exaggerated because it is founded on American immigrants and the general belief that the majority of politicians like Newt Gingrich are immigrants.
STEwarT and Hodgman are using the Straw Man fallacy to make their case even more convincing. Or, for example, they are considered dangerous people who bring immigrant violence, diseases and all kinds of social diseases; Then they change the positons and show how innocent the hosts are and are not entitled to any property brought by the immigrants.
