<h2>1960 and today's teenagers lives contradictory.</h2>
Explanation:
Across the world, there is a major transition from now to then. There are various factors associated. One reason could be, "Technology innovation" too.
1960 Teens:
- Works according to the guidance of parents
- Get experience along with guidance of elders first and then take decision
- Judge a person by moving with him/ her for years
- Does not depend entirely on first impression. Takes risks only after thoroughly moving. Less possibility of falling into problems.
Today's Teens:
- Works according to what he / she thinks.
- Take decision on his / her own. But few gets guidance from their elders
- Judge with outward look
- Assume that a person is good / bad according to the first impression and even might fall into problems
Answer: "my life is my foe's debt"
Explanation:
Answer:
The phrase brilliant science most likely means your are very advanced or smart at science. Sorryyy if this doesn't make any sense.
Answer:
The option which best states the author's overall purpose in this text is:
D. To inform the reader of a theory that attempts to explain why generations act the way they do.
Explanation:
I looked this question up and found out it concerns the text "What Past Generations Can Teach Us About Our Future," by former Newsweek correspondent Mike Kubic (born in 1927).
According to the article, Strauss & Howe developed a theory that explains and, in a way, even predicts how each generation will act. There are four "turnings" or stages which generations go through. According to Strauss & Howe's observations, these stages always happen in the same order: high, awakening, unraveling, and crisis. The generation belonging to each turning will always present certain traits and behaviors concerning their sense of community, individualism, economic prosperity, respect for institutions, etc.
<u>According to Kubic, this theory has been both praised and criticized, even though, so far, it has been able to successfully make predictions about the American society. However, it is important to note that Kubic does not praise or criticize it himself. All he does is describe and explain it. His purpose is to inform readers about the existence of the theory.</u>
Answer:
2. The bell weighed more than 2,000 pounds and was 12 feet in circumference around the bottom.