Generally speaking, objective historians behave in all of the following ways except that "<span>D. they interpret the evidence according to their personal beliefs and values" since this is not being objective. </span>
Answer:
citizens what? please elaborate. thank you
Explanation:
Answer: <em>B. The ironclad
</em>
Explanation:
The main battle between ironclads occurred on 9 March 1862, as the defensively covered Monitor was conveyed to shield the Union's wooden armada from the ironclad smash Virginia and Confederate warships. With the clash of Hampton Roads, maritime fighting changed forever. Ironclads were warships intended to be impenetrable to foe shot and shell by the excellence of their iron-shielded wooden structures.
Different names for these boats incorporate rams, defensive layer clads, iron gophers, iron elephants, iron pine boxes, turtle-backs, and mud-smashers. So incredible were the ironclads that they upset an ancient axiom of naval warfare that forts were stronger than ships.
Answer:
To give the reader an idea of the complicated work required for the garment's worker's strike.
Explanation:
This passage is quite complicated. That is because the needs of the strike organizers were complicated as well. First, the speakers had to be found to report the progress of the strike back to the workers. Then, a fund would also have to be raised for strikers so they can access help with legal and personal problems. It is said that publicity(attention) was also a vital need for the strikers. They obviously needed the community's attention to make a difference, but this is dangerous because the strikers were targeted and so were the workers who requested the strike. Photos and eyewitness accounts of the workers on the boundary, in other words, the picket lines, were harrassed because the police obviously didn't approve of the strikers. Not only was the work of a striker complicated, but it was also dangerous.
I hope this helped in some way.
The actual objective was to ensure a state of total post-war continental hegemony for Nazi Germany. This was to be achieved by the expansion of the territorial base of the German state itself, combined with the political and economic subjugation of the rest of Europe to Germany
