1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
15

Should U.S. courts continue to adhere to this common law principle, given that our government now regulates so many areas by sta

tute?
Law
1 answer:
weqwewe [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.

Explanation:

The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.

Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.

There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.

You might be interested in
Which politocal party seeks cooperation with the other political partys
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:In nonpartisan elections, each candidate is eligible for office on his or her own merits. Single Dominant Party: In single dominant, or single-party systems, ...

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How does our election law regulate election campaigns?.
Rashid [163]
To regulate election campaign, there are some election rules and regulations.

According to these laws no party or candidate can

(i) bribe or threaten voters

(ii) appeal to them in the name of caste or religion.

(iii) use government resources for election campaign and

(iv)

o In case for smaller state spend more than Rs. 25 lakh in a constituency for a Lok Sabha election or Rs. 10 lakh in a constituency in an Assembly election.

o The limit for election expenditure is revised from time to time. At present the limit of expenditure for a parliamentary constituency in bigger states like U. P, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh is Rs. 40 lakhs.

o What is the limit of such expenditure for an assembly constituency in these bigger States?

o Ans. The limit of election expenditure for an assembly constituency in the above bigger states is Rs. 16 lakhs.

o This cap on election spending of candidate is over and above the partys’ common spending for election

If any party or candidate is found practising any of the above, their election can be rejected by the court even after they have won the election.

o A candidate is not free to spend as much as he likes on his election. The law prescribes that the total election expenditure shall not exceed the maximum limit prescribed under Rule 90 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. It would also amount to a corrupt practice under sec 123 (6) of R. P. Act, 1951
8 0
2 years ago
Research a supreme court decision. Tell me the for and against arguments in the court. And what it was about.
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

(Hint: Random drug tests of students involved in extracurricular activities do not violate the Fourth Amendment.)

In Veronia School District v. Acton (1995), the Supreme Court held that random drug tests of student athletes do not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures. Some schools then began to require drug tests of all students in extracurricular activities. The Supreme Court in Earls upheld this practice.

3 0
4 years ago
Why is the peaceful transfer of power considered to be one of the most important aspects of democracy?
blondinia [14]

Answer: Democracy allows people to choose their leaders and the leaders get the powers to run the government.

Explanation:

The peaceful transfer of power is considered important in democracy. In this the powers or leadership is smoothly handed over to the newly elected or selected members of the population. This results after the election or the during transmission of powers to different political regime.

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME I WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

A. Witness

B. Feedback

Hope this helped.

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Give two reasons why critics argue reporters should not be protected by shield laws
    11·1 answer
  • Forensic analysis of illegal substances takes place in the
    6·1 answer
  • When driving in the winter, you should do what
    6·1 answer
  • Will you help me utyrdfyguhjilk;oiuhytfrgyhutrddfvgbhnjkkk
    9·2 answers
  • What drugs are commonly abused?​
    15·2 answers
  • Name and explain two laws that protect citizens against human trafficking
    13·1 answer
  • I know this is not about work but I need help. I was watching an anime years ago and I can't remember the name but I hope my des
    9·2 answers
  • How many court systems are there in the united states.
    11·1 answer
  • The first major piece of antitrust legislation was the
    13·1 answer
  • In the modern world, the most significant and common application of the doctrine of strict liability is in the area of
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!