1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
15

Should U.S. courts continue to adhere to this common law principle, given that our government now regulates so many areas by sta

tute?
Law
1 answer:
weqwewe [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.

Explanation:

The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.

Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.

There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.

You might be interested in
• J20P13Q3 Explain how the system of precedent
NNADVOKAT [17]

One way a judge can avoid precedent if they believe the case is outdated.

4 0
3 years ago
Joe has recently been admitted to the bar. Attorney Dan hires Joe as an Associate to supervise the work of Sally, the paralegal
ratelena [41]

The correct answer is C;  It is improper for Joe to assume these responsibilities as he may not sign documents using Dan's name.

Further Explanation:

Joe can't sign the attorneys name on any legal questions or documents on the titles. This is unethical as this is forgery since he isn't signing his own name. If Joe does sign off with the attorneys signature and the search was not correct then the attorney, Sally, and Joe will all be in legal trouble.

The attorney will have to review Sally's work and sign off on it. Since Joe is an attorney, he could actually sign his own name to these papers if it is within his job description and there would be no issues.

Learn more about paralegals at brainly.com/question/1878109

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
The idea that crime is a persons choice is
Lorico [155]
The answer will be A hope this helps
7 0
1 year ago
Do maryland police officers have to let victims know their rights
jenyasd209 [6]
If you are a victim, under Maryland law: Police must inform you of your basic rights as a victim so the answer is yes.
I hope it helps
Can you please give me a brainliest answer because I am just one more tk get my other rank pls ☺️
3 0
2 years ago
I am going to sue you if it is the last thing I do. Curse you Brainly!!!
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

Um okay

Explanation:

Thank you lol

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • "Rule of law" refers to the (4 points)
    7·1 answer
  • How old are you?wwwwwwwwwwwddwddwwdwdwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
    12·2 answers
  • When a law has been violated, what must be given?
    8·1 answer
  • Assess how the media is supposed to exercise its roles and RESPONSIBILIES in reporting on human right violation in a democracy
    7·1 answer
  • The reason for allowing discovery is ?
    10·1 answer
  • 2. Symptoms and complications of
    15·1 answer
  • What occurs first in a criminal proceeding?
    10·2 answers
  • The role of Georgia’s executive branch is to operate departments and to __<br> halp plz
    11·1 answer
  • 10) Which of the following is based on the belief that criminals do not have complete choice
    10·1 answer
  • However, a few Article 2 provisions (e.g., the implied warranty of merchantability) are narrower and require a person to be a me
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!