1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
15

Should U.S. courts continue to adhere to this common law principle, given that our government now regulates so many areas by sta

tute?
Law
1 answer:
weqwewe [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.

Explanation:

The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.

Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.

There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.

You might be interested in
Should Jennifer be made to go to school, if the money she makes working helps support her family? A 13-year-old who works is a v
polet [3.4K]

Answer:Some families have no choice because they need to go to work.

Explanation:

!/3 of parents in 3 states may not send their children to school.

- Michigan

- Ohio

- Illinois

5 0
3 years ago
The case Frye v. United States in 1923:____.
Simora [160]
Established standards for accepting scientific evidence
7 0
3 years ago
Give me one word that can describe a diplomat.
cluponka [151]

Answer:

fancy

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The goal of law ideally is to regulate human conduct so people can live together in harmony
frutty [35]
True..I’m guessing but I’m not
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help!! 40 points
Finger [1]
When a product fails to perform as warranted, this is called a) contractual liability. O b) product malfunction. c) malicious manufacture. d) breach of warranty
can you heelp me ! :)
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write ten examples of public facilities which Nigerian citizens are expected to protect as their civic responsibility.
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a hair characteristic scientists view microscopically?
    5·1 answer
  • Appellate court judges ask these during oral<br> argument
    14·1 answer
  • Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law.with specific references to the law of contact.discuss
    10·1 answer
  • How should<br>we utilize our<br>rights?​
    14·1 answer
  • How is a crime scene recorded
    8·2 answers
  • Crie algumas alternativas para combater a discriminação na nossa sociedade
    9·1 answer
  • Breaking a contract is a violation of which type of law?
    13·1 answer
  • What are the six statutory elements of robbery​
    12·1 answer
  • 4. What do you think is more important, our privacy or national security? Explain your<br> answer.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!