It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
another way to look at it would be one of the most difficult issues in foreign policy is deciding when the United States should exercise military force. Most people think that military force may be used if a vital national interest of the United States is threatened. The difficulty lies in getting people to agree on what constitutes a vital national interest.
Almost everyone would agree that an attack by a foreign country on the United States threatens a vital interest. Many also would think a vital interest threatened if a country attacked a nation that we had signed a security agreement with. Disagreements emerge when the threat involves the free flow of a precious commodity, such as oil. They also surface over situations that do not pose an immediate threat to U.S. security but could imperil it in the future, such as when a region becomes unstable and the instability may lead to wider conflicts. Another area of debate opens over human rights and humanitarian efforts. The United States is the most powerful democratic nation on Earth. Does that mean we always have a vital interest in promoting human rights and democracy? Or, should we stay out of the affairs of other nations unless they threaten other of our national interests?
Another issue arises over how the United States should exercise military force. Some argue that America should never act unilaterally, but should only act with others, allies or particularly with the United Nations. They believe America has a strong interest in upholding international law. Others agree that it is appropriate to act in coalitions, but they think demanding it in every circumstance would paralyze America’s role as a world leader.
Can you go into more detail on what this question entails? I am a little confused!
Answer:
alliteration
Explanation:
why did u delete my answer before lol
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.
Native population are better off left alone than influenced by into a colonizer's culture.
Explanation: The Tempest was a play which was written by William Shakespeare probably during 1601 to 1611. The story about a remote island where a boat reached. The story is about Prospero and his daughter and their two servants Caliban and Ariel.
During the writing of the play there was an interest in the audience about the European colonizers and the natives in many places around the world.
In the play it is shown that Prospero thinks about himself superior than Caliban. He thought he has given education to the Caliban. But Caliban soon realized that Prospero gave him education to take the leadership from and Prospero thinks Caliban as a second class citizen. Soon Caliban became violent and angry with him.
So from the drawn theme of the play it can be said that the relationship between the colonizer and the settler was never warm.
Therefore native populations are better off left alone than influenced by into a colonizer's culture.
The poem was written by Michael Drayton in order to celebrate the expedition which brought about the founding of Jamestown.
- The poem was to honor the expedition of Sir Walter Raleigh which led to the planting of a permanent settlement. The poem depicted the culture that the Southerners came from.
- Drayton presented the New World to his audience by talking about the bravery of the travelers. He talked about their journey and that when they got to the shore of Virginia, they were going to see many beautiful things.
- Drayton was known as the first poet that wrote odes which looked like Horace. He had an influence in the way that other poets wrote their poems such as John Dryden.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/17781969
