Answer:
1. "I heard sounds from heaven;and I heard sounds from hell!"
2. "Listen! Listen!"
Explanation:
When the narrator is pointing something out in this way-by stating the dialogue in an urgent, anxious way, it creates a sense of anticipation in the audience/readers.
If scientists made medicine to live forever with no strings attached then maybe I would take it. It depends on who it is handing me it, If it was a bad person then no but if they were good people then maybe, I would only do it if my parents told me to. Did you know Sonnet 65 is by William Shakespeare and is one of several poems that discusses time, aging, and what writing can and cannot do to fight against these forces? Shakespeare's central theme is the opposition between the transitory, delicate nature of beauty and the devastating effect on the beauty of mortality and its principal instrument, time. The opening questions seem rhetorical, indirectly arguing the poet's conviction that beauty is no match for aging and death. Again I wouldn't know what to do if doctors or scientists gave me random medicine then I don't know. I know if the medicine was important then my parents would give it to me not random scientists.
Answer:
what do you want us to do this is not a question
thanks for the points though
Explanation:
The correct answer to the given question above is the content of "What Exactly Are Green House Gases". The author in the story "An Inconvenient Truth" uses the content of "What Exactly Are Green House Gases" to emphasize how humans can improve the atmosphere.
