Answer:
The conditions under which each funding method for paying for IT system expenses would be recommended are:
Allocation method is preferred to other methods when actual usage cannot be captured but, some other cost drivers can be used as the allocation bases.
Chargeback method works better than others when actual usage by each unit can be accurately captured.
Explanation:
The Allocation Funding Method charges IT costs to individuals, departments, or business units based on revenues, number of employees, and other cost drivers and not based on usage. It is often used when actual usage cannot be recorded.
The chargeback method charges IT costs to individuals, departments, or business units based on their actual usage of the IT services. With wide variation in IT usage, business units need to be charged their actual costs consumed.
The corporate budget method allocates IT cost based on a periodic predetermined rate. It is used where unit managers need to be given control over their budgets, enabling them to search for cost-saving technologies.
Explanation:
a) A free market would allow the laws of demand and supply to flourish; prices of commodities will be set by manufacturers based on demand. However, Government regulations which interfere with the free market is going to result in feeling the pain of monopoly.
b) Indeed, the price mechanism when controlled by the government can result in efficient provision of public goods.
One such example of a public good ls PMS (premium motor spirit) used as petrol in most vehicles. Controlling the price of petrol by the government in most cases helps avoid excessive charges from petrol stations per pump price.
Answer:
$650,000
Explanation:
The total cost of a company may be grouped into fixed and variable cost. The fixed cost remains constant at a given range of activity levels while the variable cost increases proportionately as the level of activities.
The total variable cost is the product of the unit variable cost and the number of units produced.
Hence, total cost in 2011
= $500,000 + $150,000
= $650,000
Answer:
c. It reverts back to C
Explanation:
Grantor C conveys a large house and land to his daughter and son-in-law to be theirs as long as they are married. One year later they are divorced, The property is reverted back to C that is the Grantor. The property is neither given to the daughter nor to the son-in-law. This according to the American court law.
Answer: PERSONAL COMMUNICATION
Explanation: In the given case, the salesman of the store is personally interacting with the customer for establishing a relationship.
The human behavior reacts positively when someone gives them importance and listens to them without any judgement. Similarly, in this case the salesman is trying to win the confidence of the customer by persuading him with personal attention.