Answer:
(View Explanation)
Explanation:
While it is misleading to view the stock market crash of 1929 as the sole cause of the Great Depression, the dramatic events of that October did play a role in the downward spiral of the American economy. The crash, which took place less than a year after Hoover was inaugurated, was the most extreme sign of the economy’s weakness. Multiple factors contributed to the crash, which in turn caused a consumer panic that drove the economy even further downhill, in ways that neither Hoover nor the financial industry was able to restrain. Hoover, like many others at the time, thought and hoped that the country would right itself with limited government intervention. This was not the case, however, and millions of Americans sank into grinding poverty.
Hope this is Helpful! :D
Answer:
Special political parties
Explanation:
your welcome
True, (if this is wrong i apologize) but i am sure it is right
Earth's magnetic field protects us from the powerful Solar Wind and it is also essential for the use of compasses (if anybody actually uses them anymore).
I hope this helps! :)
Explanation:
Islam didn’t prosper in Central Africa because Islam was meant for regions with radical geographical inequalities.
That is, Islam is a desert religion… and Central Africa is a wet tropical region without the geographic inequalities of the desertic lands. Islam simply was not needed there.
So, let’s ellaborate: the main argument of the article is that Islam was born as a desert religion in a region characterized for very wealthy and productive “pockets” of arable land located amidst large regions of un-arable desert (this is, radical geographic inequality). This meant that the inhabitants of the poor lands had little incentive to invest in any kind of capital acumulation and, instead, every incentive to raid and take what the rich pockets produced. The resulting equilibrium meant a state of perpetual unstability and conflict between these two parts of the population.
Islam solved this through an economic doctrine of both static and dynamic redistribution. In essence, the “rich” regions were obligated to pay a religious tax given then to the “poor” regions and capital accumulation was prevented. In the words of the authors:
