The conclusion about the Holy Office of the Portuguese Inquisition in Brazil is best supported by the passage that it investigated whether beliefs were contrary to Catholic teachings.
The main objective of the Holy Office was to investigate and judge cases where Catholicism was violated, that is, to eradicate individuals who had converted to other religions, such as Judaism.
The Portuguese inquisition expanded to the Portuguese colonies in:
The Inquisition therefore had an influence on the social, political and cultural life of the Portuguese and their colonies. There were investigations into cases of witchcraft, book censorship, and accusations of heresy, which culminated in trials and arrests.
So the correct alternative is the letter A.
Find more information about the Portuguese Inquisition here:
brainly.com/question/2007992
With new found resources, more people wanted to join the sciences and arts. With that much resources into science, what we knew exploded into so much more.
Answer:
they feared the threat of an attack by the Allied forces.
Explanation:
If they had not feared the threat of attack, they would not have signed the deal that crippled their government.
Answer:
1. flooding
2. Old Kingdom
3. Rosetta Stone
4. monotheism
5. Sobekneferu
6. New Kingdom
7. The Nile was the main source of water and the main route of transit in ancient Egypt. Its annual flooding was predictable and enriched the soil, which made the Nile River Valley one of the most productive in the ancient world.
8. The Egyptians worshipped many gods. The pharaohs were not only the head of the religion in Egypt, but their rule was also thought to be ordained by the gods. Ancient Egyptians believed that the afterlife was similar to their living life and wanted to prepare people for a similar existence after death. As a result, for the pharaohs during the Old Kingdom, the pyramids were constructed as elaborate tombs that contained everything that a ruler might need in the afterlife.
Explanation:
PF
<span>
if direct democracy means (pure) democracy then it means that every
citizen would get a chance to vote on issues instead of what we have in
the US: a representative democracy where we vote in politicians to do it
for us. A pure democracy would lead to civil war most likely b/c too
many people would be able to disagree, anarchy would be a likely
result,....so i would say D is your answer </span>
