The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, it is not ethical.
The risks that Emerald faces by not upholding his responsibility for the collection and payment of employment taxes is that, first of all, this is not correct. He has an obligation, a moral and a fiscal obligation to report on time the employment taxes. That is why his actions are not ethical although he indeed does pay before he gets caught. That decision could be a business decision to buy some time and trying t fix other problems, but a true leader does not need to cover things with wrongdoings. What can of example is he showing to his employees?
Later on, on another occasion, he won't have the moral authority to demand ethical behavior from his employees. He is not setting an example.
1. In the criminal justice system, John can temporarily put Jack in custody pending the arrival of the police. Jack was not detained for a period longer than five minutes and not for a civil wrong.
Thus, in this lawsuit for the tort of unlawful imprisonment, Jack will lose because he committed a crime. He cannot apply a civil law to a criminal case.
2. Adriana is correct that her personal assets cannot be reached in this lawsuit brought by the shareholders of DEF, Inc. because SLA Accountants, LLP is a limited liability partnership and not just an ordinary partnership.
A limited liability partnership, like a limited liability company, offers members limited liability. However, the shareholders of DEF, Inc. may decide to sue Adriana personally.
3. Andrew is wrong because the car handed over by Sam was not a completed inter-vivos gift. The transfer was not absolute but conditional upon Sam not returning from the Middle East.
As a conditional transfer of gift, the vesting of the ownership interest created by the transfer depends on the fulfillment of a condition.
Thus, since the transfer condition did not materialize, Andrew should return the car to Sam in good faith.
Learn more about inter vivos gifts and limited liability partnerships here brainly.com/question/14767795 and brainly.com/question/1166757
Answer:
It will take 16.09 years.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Future value= $20,000
Present value= $5,000
Interest rate= 9%
<u>To calculate the number of years required to reach the objective, we need to use the following formula:</u>
n= ln(FV/PV) / ln(1+i)
n= ln(20,000 / 5,000) / ln(1.09)
n= 16.09
It will take 16.09 years.
Can you please explain more? :)
