The correct answer should be Leonardo did not intend for his inventions to do harm.
I saw on the Internet that B and D are incorrect, so we have to choose between A and C. A is also incorrect because Leonardo had much greater plans for his inventions that simply to investigate the properties of snow. This leaves us with C as the correct answer - he wanted to advance science, rather than create a bad invention.
The author word choice of using words like ardour and avidity made it clear that the gentleman got very much pleasure reading based on the definitions of the two words. In fact, it's not a great stretch to say he had an addiction since it got in the way of his basic needs which is what the first sentence was basically shouting at the reader. My interpretation is that the man was to much in his thoughts to take care of himself. From that I concluded that him trying to understand the absolute meaning of Don Belianis broke his fragile state; the only thing that keep the gentleman going was his joyful understanding of complex books, but he couldn't understand a author of a great book's writing.
Recesión I hope I could be of use
Answer:
The statistics show how many people aren't vaccinating their children.
Explanation:
Statistics aren't provided specifically to writers by doctors, they come from whatever reports the writer chooses to use, so that rules out choice 2.
I assume the passage is making a point about how vaccines should be trusted and the anti-vax movement is detrimental, so choice 3 would prove the opposite point.
Statistics are logical, not emotional, so choice 4 is out.
Therefore, choice 1 is the only logical answer.
(I can't be completely sure of this answer without seeing the actual paragraph- I could be wrongly assuming the point that the author is trying to make. If they are trying to prove that vaccines <em>are</em> widely used, then the answer is choice 3. However, that doesn't seem like a very argumentative point to me, so I assumed that they were trying to prove that vaccines need to be used <em>more</em>, making the answer choice 1.)
<span>The word that should not be used in the comparative or superlative degree is D. absolute. The word absolute is already at the highest degree possible - nothing can be more or less absolute than something else, because it is already complete and perfect. You cannot say - It is the most absolute of all - because that would mean all things are absolute, which obviously is not true. Wealthy, smart, and sweet do have comparative and superlative degrees, but absolute doesn't.</span>
