1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
3 years ago
11

What is one possible reason a constitutional monarchy developed in England while an absolute monarchy continued in Russia

History
2 answers:
Alexxx [7]3 years ago
5 0

Constitutional monarchy developed in England because the Magna Carta placed limits on the Kings in 1215. Gradually the idea of ​​a Parliament began to take shape, which, little by little, removed powers from the monarchs. In 1649, King Charles I rebelled, found that he had unlimited powers, raised taxes as much as he could, and as a result was judged as a traitor and executed. After a period of exception, the monarchy was reinstituted with its son, Charles II, in the power. The message was clear: the monarchy could not and could not aspire to be absolute, thus passing to constitutional monarchy.

This kind of monarchy did not develop in Russia because the monarchy was overthrown during the Russian revolution and was never restored. In its place the Bolshevik Party took over.

Newly industrialized and suffering from World War I, Russia had a large mass of workers and peasants working hard and earning little. In addition, Tsar Nicholas II's absolutist government disliked the people who wanted a less oppressive and more democratic leadership. The sum of the factors led to popular demonstrations that caused the monarch to resign and, at the end of the process, gave rise to the Soviet Union, the first socialist country in the world, which lasted until 1991.

drek231 [11]3 years ago
5 0

What is one possible reason a constitutional monarchy developed in England, while an absolute monarchy continued in Russia?

A~ England was more economically developed than Russia and didn’t rely on a strong monarch to address the nation’s issues.

B~ Russian monarchs like Peter the Great increased the power of the nobility, while English monarchs like Elizabeth I refused to consult with the English Parliament. 

C~ Russian monarchs deeply resented the intrusion of religious authorities into affairs of state, while English monarchs believed they owed allegiance to the head of the Church. 

D~ Russia thrived economically under absolute monarchs, while England relied on a struggling Parliament .

You might be interested in
Hammurabi is best remembered for his
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:    Hammurabi's Code

Explanation:  Hammurabi was the Babylonian king, a member of the Babylonian Dynasty that ruled Mesopotamia. Hammurabi himself ruled from 1792 to 1750 BC,  and fought against other kingdoms and dynasties in Mesopotamia created the great Babylonian Empire. He is best known for his law written about 1754 BC, and contains 282 rules, laws, and this is considered one of the oldest written laws in the world. This law precisely defines social classes, rights and obligations.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the relationship between the coastlines on the east side of the atlantic and those on the west side?
TEA [102]

The answer to your question is,

Continents on the east side could fit snugly against those on the west.

-Mabel <3

8 0
3 years ago
 Write a two- or three-paragraph essay comparing the system of direct democracy adopted by Athens and the system of government
Wittaler [7]
<span>When writing an essay like this, it is important to make connections between the historical issues at hand and the current events that are shaped by these issues. So make sure to talk about how a direct democracy has one vote per person, while the other is representative. </span><span />
3 0
3 years ago
What colonies are called the New England colonies?
anygoal [31]

Answer:

The New England colonies were made up of the colonies of Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in what ways did economic competition between countries come at the expense of others select all correct answers?
horsena [70]
The answers to the question from the options given elsewhere are:
- Countries paid taxes to each others
- Competitions was intense for economic controls

 This resulted from the need to maximize profits while ensuring economic control.The taxes and competition of course hurt other countries as well.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The largest number of immigrants to the american colonies in the eighteenth century were
    12·1 answer
  • In the period 1890–1915, all of the following were generally true about African Americans EXCEPT:
    7·2 answers
  • Durning the early 1800s what factor most contributed to the south having agriculture economy
    13·1 answer
  • When did the renaissance reach england and how did it affect english culture
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Which idea about leadership would Niccolo
    10·2 answers
  • Solve the inequality x/8 &gt; 4<br> A. x &gt; 2<br> b. x &gt; 32<br> c. x &gt; –4<br> d. x &gt; 1/2
    7·2 answers
  • How is a joint resolution different than a bill?
    13·2 answers
  • More rights are given to the people is to the 9 thAmendment As rights given to the states is to the _______________
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE WILL AWARD BRAINIEST!!
    5·1 answer
  • Where did the Russians locate their first settlement in the New World?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!