In general, when anything is "merit based" it means that it relies strictly on the knowledge and ability of the person in question, instead of special privilege such as family connections. <span />
The result of the Battle of Bunker Hill was a clear victory of the Americans.
Hey!
Hope this helps...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do not believe there is the right reason for any country to go into war. Although if I had to pick one reason that a country might go into a war, or a reason that could be justifiable for going into war. My decision would be going into war to protect an ally from an invasion.
This is not because of the thought of war, this is because if a country lose his allies, it would be defenseless when war is thrust of the pawn that country who needed that Ally.
So i would say the answer is: B.) to protect an Ally from an invasion.
Answer:
I think its all of the above but it also could be just c or even just a. not b.
Explanation:
I believe that the rights of all people can not be protected due to the large amounts of people on the planet, and the fact that this number is steadily increasing. There is no known way to ensure the rights of every single person, and in my humble opinion not all people deserve rights. For instance, a mother that kills her child or children in cold blood would not deserve the rights offered to other mothers. This is not always the case and in an idealistic universe, the rights of every human would be protected and cherished, not because they "should" per se, but rather because every human lovingly gave them and deserved them. Seeing as this is not the case, I would say the rights of all people can not be protected, as unfortunate as that is...
