1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DochEvi [55]
3 years ago
12

How do the reasons for U.S. entry into the war given by President Wilson differ from those given by Senator Norris? Whose perspe

ctive do you find the most convincing? Why?
Social Studies
2 answers:
Artist 52 [7]3 years ago
5 0

President Wilson did not want to subdue its nation to German military forces, the reason why he declared the war to Germany and affirmed that although send his population to war sounded terrible, they needed to defend their rights and make to listen to their voices; he secured it would be the beginning of the freedom through his discourse of fourteen points. Meanwhile, Norris and other senators voted against the Germany war declaration. Norris claimed that the war would remove the prosperity to the citizens, that it was cruel and inhuman and it just carried the money to manufacture of ammunition and not for the nation's benefits.  

Of course, President Wilson had reason defend the governators' rights of different nations, included his, but maybe it was not the better way because the Senator Norris had the reason too; the violence and the war just would carry misfortune to the nation.


ser-zykov [4K]3 years ago
3 0

Woodrow Wilson wrote 14 points that would represent concrete morally defensible motives for the United States to enter the war. Most of them are geopolitical claims of European countries with little bargaining power, which are being stifled by the alliance of central countries participating in the Great War. These points would give legitimacy to the entry of the United States into the war after having been neutral since its inception, and would have the purpose of putting an end to the wars between different nations by creating diplomatic mechanisms and supranational institutions that allow the operation of them.

<em>Quite the contrary, </em>Senator George William Norris expounded in his speeches the reasons why the United States should not enter the Great War. Norris's arguments were based on expressing that the entry into the war was driven by big businessmen of the industrial-military conglomerate, bankers and brokers of Wall Street, who feared losing the money loaned to the nations of the Triple Entente and saw a opportunity to maximize their profits at the expense of the suffering of millions of Americans who would be greatly harmed by participating in the war.

<em>Finally</em> the United States entered the war with the official motive of having detected a telegram from the German minister of international relations towards the British ambassador in Mexico and the sinking of the ship Lusitania; and at the end of the war the United States ceded some of Wilson's 14 points in the negotiations with the central countries and managed to obtain the claims pointed out in other points.

Senator Norris 'arguments seem more convincing because history showed that the real reasons for the United States' entry into the conflict were to obtain economic benefits and position the country as a great military power. Wilson's arguments, on the other hand, were an excuse to achieve these proposed objectives.




You might be interested in
an important resource in South and Southeast Asia. Biodiesel fuel can be created from A natural gas B. palm oil C. lumber D. coa
melomori [17]

Biodiesel fuel can be made from new and used vegetable oils, such as palm oil. So, the answer is B.  

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was an effect of city-states forming new colonies.
antiseptic1488 [7]
A efffect of they city state could be the making the northen conline
8 0
3 years ago
Adrianne forgot to change her cat litter. The apartment smelled horrible by the end of the day. However, the longer Adrianne was
MArishka [77]

Answer:

The correct answer is E. Sensory adaptation.

Explanation:

Sensory adaptation refers to the reduction of one's sensitivity to a  stimulus after being constantly exposed to it. The individual tends to have less awareness of the stimulus and this helps him/her to <em>change his/her focus</em> to other things.

In this case, Adrianne's first exposure is strong; the smell is strong and the apartment smelled horrible to her. However, the longer she was exposed to the smell, the more used she got to it and the less she smelled it.

This is an example of sensory adaptation.

7 0
4 years ago
When did the president of Israel go into office?
fredd [130]
President Reuven assumed office July 24 2014
8 0
4 years ago
PART A: What does the word “concentrate” most closely mean as it is used in paragraph 8? A focus B gather C protect D punish
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The Germans wanted to focus on and keep watch of the Jews by creating camps.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A speaker who argues that the world's monarch butterfly population is in danger because their numbers have decreased in several
    12·1 answer
  • Which term best characterizes a decision that has bounded rationality?
    11·2 answers
  • In the past, the vast majority of people lived in rural areas and small towns where it was truly shocking to encounter a genuine
    11·1 answer
  • True or false hammurabis code showed that not all people were treated equally in Babylon
    5·2 answers
  • Select the three reasons that some of the colonists gave for NOT supporting the Revolution. PLEASE HELP
    11·2 answers
  • What factors do officials take into consideration when determining the designation of an inmate? Name three
    8·2 answers
  • How did ancient Greece differ from sparta
    7·2 answers
  • has decided to sign up for a psychology experiment at her college, and she is somewhat nervous about going into the laboratory.
    12·1 answer
  • Since american indians did not leave written records,scientist learn about them doing what
    13·1 answer
  • oliver schilke, martin reimann, karen s. cook (2021), "trust in social relations," annual review of sociology, 47, 239-259.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!