Answer:
American farmers, who gained millions of acres of land for settlement
Explanation:
Answer:
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
C) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
D) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
This would be the best way to explain what this conclusion means. The hypothesis states that more than 21% of the population suffers from professional problems due to extreme shyness. Moreover, the null hypothesis states that there is no meaningful relationship between two measured phenomena. If we "fail to reject" the hypothesis, this means that we do not have evidence that shows that the hypothesis is not true. Therefore, we can claim that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
Answer: Mr. Medeiros's approach can best be characterized as: TOKEN ECONOMY.
Explanation: Token economy can be defined as a system of behavior modification based on the principles of positive and negative reinforcement and positive and negative punishment. In this system of behavior modification, participants are rewarded with tokens for engaging in desirable activities. Tokens which are in turn used to purchase special privileges or meaningful objects..
Answer:
Extended, with at most two conclusions.
Explanation:
In short, an extended argument represents an argument that consists of two or more different sub-arguments. This indicates that you will find conclusions that represent premises for the most important conclusion of the argument. In this case, the main argument is that brokers who specialize in stocks will have a more difficult case to make in weeks to come, and the second argument is that certificates of deposit are an increasingly popular form of investment.
