The Missouri Compromise was primarily aimed at resolving the issue of admitting a slave or free state and which to divide them among after a piece of land was acquired . So the issue was controversy upon admitting slave states or free states into new territories . <span />
Answer:
A
Explanation:
because they are ones that help more because 1 we dont have a "king" 2 we have had issues with the government itself
Yes of course, The United States fought to own the right of freedom to vote. The country is founded on the belief of democracy. That we have a choice to who we want to lead us.
^ ps I bs that whole thing haha sound good tho
The development of the Napoleonic Code was a fundamental change in the nature of the civil law system, making laws clearer and more accessible. It also superseded the former conflict between royal legislative power and, particularly in the final years before the Revolution, protests by judges representing views and privileges of the social classes to which they belonged. Such conflict led the Revolutionaries to take a negative view of judges making law.
During the 19th century, the Napoleonic Code was voluntarily adopted in a number of European and Latin American countries, either in the form of simple translation or with considerable modifications.
<span>a desire to earn fame and fortune
a goal to gain land for Spain
</span><span>a desire to find gold for Spain
(more of the top one, but the other 2 was something they accomplished too)
</span><span>C. French traders learned American Indian languages and customs. Spanish settlers did not.
The French traders actually tried to get along with the Indians in good term, while the Spanish.. not so much</span>