1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denis-greek [22]
4 years ago
9

What critique of U.S. economic policy is this protestor's sign making? Fair trade not free trade Living wages for workers everyw

here
History
2 answers:
WITCHER [35]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Free trade can harm the environment because other countries may not have environmental regulations in place.

Explanation:

Novay_Z [31]4 years ago
5 0

Free trade can lead to low pay for workers in a nation.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Free trade mainly focuses on the reduction of barriers and all other policies which usually favours specific nations or other industries. In case of free trade, instead of exporting workers to the United States, lower wage countries imported the jobs to their workers.

Under the banner of free immigration lower wage nations truly enjoyed a short term benefit. Fair trade, however, favours the rights of workers and it also improved their working conditions.

You might be interested in
How is modern-day entertainment different from ancient Greek drama?
vekshin1

Answer:

the 4th answer is right

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the significance of the Armenian Genocide?
sdas [7]

Answer:

The signifiance/importance is that the Ottoman Empire failed to take the Suez Canal from the British which failed and tried to take Gallipoli which failed too. The Ottoman Empire blamed this on the Armenians causing 1 million Armenians to be killed.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Can you please help me sort this in order in events for the war of 1812?
Rufina [12.5K]
Hmmm The War of 1812 was a military conflict that lasted from June 1812 to February 1815, fought between the United States of America and the United Kingdom, its North American colonies, and its Native American allies. Historians in the United States and Canada see it as a war in its own right, but the British often see it as a minor theatre of the Napoleonic Wars. By the war's end in early 1815, the key issues had been resolved and peace returned with no boundary changes.

The United States declared war for several reasons, including trade restrictions brought about by the British war with France, the impressment of as many as 10,000 American merchant sailors into the Royal Navy,[5] British support for Native American tribes fighting European American settlers on the frontier, outrage over insults to national honor during the Chesapeake–Leopard Affair, and interest in the United States in expanding its borders west.[6] The British government, which felt it had done everything in its power to try to avert the war, were dismayed by the American declaration, and believed it to have been an opportunistic ploy by President Madison to annex Canada while it was fighting a ruinous war with France.[7] [8] The view was shared in much of New England and for that reason the war was widely referred to there as Mr Madison’s War. As a result, the primary British war goal was to defend their North American colonies.

The war was fought in three theatres. First, at sea, warships and privateers of each side attacked the other's merchant ships, while the British blockaded the Atlantic coast of the United States and mounted large raids in the later stages of the war. Second, land and naval battles were fought on the U.S.–Canadian frontier. Third, large-scale battles were fought in the Southern United States and Gulf Coast. At the end of the war, both sides signed and ratified the Treaty of Ghent and, in accordance with the treaty, returned occupied land, prisoners of war and captured ships (with the exception of warships due to frequent re-commissioning upon capture) to their pre-war owners and resumed friendly trade relations without restriction.

With the majority of its land and naval forces tied down in Europe fighting the Napoleonic Wars, the British used a defensive strategy until 1814. Early victories over poorly-led U.S. armies demonstrated that the conquest of the Canadas would prove more difficult than anticipated. Despite this, the U.S. was able to inflict serious defeats on Britain's Native American allies, ending the prospect of an independent Indian confederacy in the Midwest under British sponsorship. U.S. forces took control of Lake Erie in 1813, and seized western parts of Upper Canada, but further American offensives aimed at Montreal failed, and the war also degenerated into a stalemate in Upper Canada by 1814. In April 1814, with the defeat of Napoleon, Britain now had large numbers of spare troops and adopted a more aggressive strategy, launching invasions of the United States; however, an invasion of New York was defeated at Plattsburgh, and a second force, although successfully capturing Washington, was ultimately repulsed during an attack on Baltimore. Both governments were eager for a return to normality and peace negotiations began in Ghent in August 1814. These repulses led Britain to drop demands for a native buffer state and some territorial claims, and peace was finally signed in December 1814, although news failed to arrive before the British suffered a major defeat at New Orleans in January 1815.<span>[9]</span>

3 0
3 years ago
Describe the organization of the constitution using the words Preamble, article, and amendment.
solniwko [45]
The Constitution was written with the preamble coming in first to explain why they wrote it and stuff.
The articles come next, and they lay out how the government will work (like what powers each branch has, etc.)
The federalists believed that this was enough, but the anti-federalists pressured them into adopting a bill of rights (the first 10 amendments) to ensure that the rights of the people would not be taken away. The amendments are changes to the Constitution and come last. Credit to Brainly user
5 0
3 years ago
What threats did African Americans continue to face in the South, and what measures did Congress take to deal with these threats
rusak2 [61]
The African Americans faced many threats such as the Black codes, which were laws that were passed in the south during the civil war that restricted rights of freed slaves. Some of the codes included making it illegal for African Americans to rent farms or own them. Allowing the White employers to take advantage of the African American workers. And allowing officials to arrest an fine unemployed African Americans. The congress responded with the 14th and 15th Amendment.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which agreement did individuals enter into to form their own society?
    14·1 answer
  • Harriet Tubman role in the abolitionist movement
    9·1 answer
  • Which describes the middle passage
    12·2 answers
  • Which is the best explanation for why the Cold War is not included in this chart? (5 points)
    8·1 answer
  • How do we prevent future genocides?
    5·1 answer
  • The confirmation process allows the Senate to __________.
    5·2 answers
  • Please never cheat on tests
    14·1 answer
  • In a skewed distribution, a median score more accurately reflects the average than a mean score does. True or False
    11·2 answers
  • Bleeding Kansas occurred when people tried to flood into Kansas upon hearing that popular sovereignty would determine if it woul
    7·1 answer
  • I need some help on this asap!!!!
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!