Answer:
The author challenges readers, which makes readers question their own views on protecting sequoias.
Explanation:
The impact of the author's choice to begin the article with those two sentences was to challenge the reader to question their views about protecting sequoias.
The first sentence began by saying that we are often told that the world is deteriorating because of love of money (sacrifice to mormon) and that every sequoia he knows is "waving its branches for joy" because it has heard the good news about the defending of trees.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. All of the following are possible sources of error in a scientific investigation except for completing multiple trials during an experiment. Completing multiple trials will instead help you minimize errors in the experiment.
Answer:
wow that sounds cool I wish I were smarter so i could answer that but I cannot
Explanation:
When added to the word detect, the suffix which means "a person who" is -ive.
"A person who" means that you need to create a noun which refers to a person by adding that suffix. If you add -ive to detect, you will get the noun detective, which is obviously a person.
The word detectary doesn't exist, and the word detection doesn't refer to a person, but rather the act of detecting.
