Explanation:
no because we unique in our way, even we might look alike to the touch, much like identical twins but there’s always something that sets one person apart from one another. Down to the way that they think, walk, speak, point of view on things even two people read the same exact book, laugh, sneeze and so on. Someone’s hand writing will never ever be the exact same as the person who would have the similar hand writing a thousand years ago. Even that person were alive today, sat in the same chair, had the same pen in their, even if the timing seemed almost perfect down to milisecond that pen hit the piece of paper, it could never be the same and it will never be the same.
Answer:
A minor character's storyline is as important and developed as the major characters' storylines.
Explanation:
Let's take a popular book series, like The Hunger Games or Harry Potter. In the Hunger Games, Katniss Evergreen is the main character, or, the major character as your question poses. The book focuses on her and her development. However, it also focuses on Peeta, who is technically a minor character, as the books predominantly focus on Katniss; but Peeta still had development, and proved to become vital to the storyline.
In Harry Potter, let's look at the 'Golden Trio'. Harry Potter is clearly the main character, and his development is evident all throughout the books. However, without his partners in crime, Ron Weasly and Hermione Granger, he never would have gotten very far. While there isn't much showcased in the books about their development, it's still there, just subtly so.
Answer: Graph Y
Explanation:
The tool is floating at a rate of 2.0 meters every 1.0 seconds so both the distance and time are changing. Neither is constant which rules out graphs X and Z.
The distance is increasing as time increases which rules out Graph W which depicts a scenario where the tool is coming closer to the astronaut as time increases.
Correct option is therefore Graph Y as it shows the tool moving at a rate of 2.0 meters per second.
<span>Because your
goal for this essay is to discuss how Shakespeare transformed the original
source, you’ll want to focus, first, on what they both have in common (comparing
similar attributes). Then, you’ll want
to focus on how elements of similarities were changed or how new things
entirely were added or how things may have even been omitted (contrast). This can be done in one of two ways—block or
point by point.
</span>
<span />
<span>If you
format the essay in block format, you’ll first discuss in a paragraph or two
elements selected for discussion in “Pyramus and Thisbe.” Then, after you finish discussing Ovid’s myth,
you’ll discuss, also in a paragraph or two, the elements being
compared/contrasted in Shakespeare’s work.
Be sure to discuss the same points in the same order in block
method. A compare/contrast essay in this
method might resemble the following:</span>
INTRO
PARAGRAPH
BODY PARAGRAPH
– Ovid
Attribute 1
Attribute 2
Attribute 3
BODY
PARAGRAPH – Shakespeare
Attribute 1
Attribute 2
Attribute 3
CONCLUSION
<span>Another
method used when constructing a compare/contrast essay is called point by
point. In this format, you will discuss
elements of both works within the same paragraph and do so point by point. An essay constructed in this manner might
resemble the following: </span>
INTRODUCTION
PARAGRAPH
Attribute
from Ovid
Same attribute
from Shakespeare
PARAGRAPH
Attribute
from Ovid
Same attribute
from Shakespeare
PARAGRAPH
Attribute
from Ovid
Same attribute
from Shakespeare
CONCLUSION
<span>In this type
for format, be sure to always discuss the same work first. Thus, Ovid should always be mentioned first,
then you’ll follow that up with a discussion of Shakespeare because, after all,
you are supposed to be discussing how Shakespeare changed things, and this
would make the most sense. Point by
point would probably be the most efficient manner in which to highlight the
transformations made by Shakespeare since it would keep both elements fresh
within the mind/eye of the reader.</span>
I think he was nervous or happy i cant remember
