Answer:
The freedom of expression of minorities and political dissenters may be targeted for reasons that are not publicly justifiable. In this context, majoritarian interests can infiltrate limitation grounds such as national security, public order, public health, and public morals.
Answer: Functionalist
Explanation: The functionalist theory suggest to focus on utility and purpose of human behavior to improve the stability and efficiency in the society. It suggests that the social environment keeps changing in the world and humans should adapt to those changes for keeping stability in the world.
Thus, we can conclude that functionalist is the right answer.
Correct answer: the hypothetico-deductive method.
Explanation: This model or method is a propose description of the scientific method. A researcher propose an hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable. Then he/she must come up with tests for the observable data that he/she has. With this test the hypothesis can be proven true or false.
In summary, this method (The H-D method) is the procedure to build scientific theories. The results obtained come from direct observation or experimentation and will help to predict future effects that can be verified or proven by empirical evidence.
Answer: True
Options: True/False
Explanation: An officer who is present when a crime is being committed can make an arrest without a warrant. Their presence includes the use of any of their senses, whether they hear, see, smell, to perceive that a crime is being committed.
However, an officer can't make an arrest based on a hunch or a suspicion. While she does not have to be absolutely certain, there needs to be a belief based on facts or circumstances to make such an arrest. This is known as probable cause.
Yes, because morally, it’s the right thing to do. Our common humanity means that those of us who are doing well (often doing <em>too</em> well) should help those whose basic needs are not met. And, in part, our personal and national wealth has often been created by the exploitation of poor people – colonial extraction of resources, the slavery and opium trades, unfair international trade and finance practices and others. Reallocating just <em>1% of global wealth</em> would eradicate extreme income poverty at a stroke. Those of us who are ‘better-off’ would be stupid not to help the poor. If we want a prosperous, politically stable and environmentally sustainable world for ourselves (and for future generations), then we have to help poor people in poorer, less fortunate lands.
Hope this helps, honey. Best of luck with assignments like these.