1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Black_prince [1.1K]
3 years ago
14

Summarize How have the natural resources of the Middle East affected it recent history?

History
1 answer:
puteri [66]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

As the two most important resources in the region, water and oil have caused such conflicts. Oil is the most abundant resource in the Middle East, and many countries' economies are dependent on it. However, oil is not equally distributed between all countries.

Explanation:

Oil money has created both opportunities and problems for the region.

An empty filling station, Portland, Oregon, November 1973. The Arab oil embargo caused a huge shortage of gasoline in Western countries. [ enlarge ]

Middle Eastern nations have learned to manipulate their production of oil as an international strategy. After the unsuccessful Yom Kippur War with Israel in 1973, an OPEC oil embargo by Arab nations demonstrated a new way to influence European and American policy. Oil prices quadrupled from $3 a barrel in 1972 to $12 a barrel in 1974. In the U.S., the era of cheap gas came to an end, stimulating research on increasing energy efficiency, conservation, and alternative fuels as well as exploration for alternative sources of oil.

Uneven distribution of petroleum deposits has created a disparity of wealth and power in the Middle East. Gulf countries with relatively small populations have the most oil. When workers from countries with large, poor populations, such as Egypt, come to the Gulf region to work, they are often treated as second-class citizens. Meanwhile, wealthy Saudis and Kuwaitis may vacation in Egypt, openly drinking alcohol and displaying other behaviors that would not be permitted in their home countries. Even within oil-rich nations themselves, there is a large gap between rich and poor.

You might be interested in
Why would the united states return seized property to the loyalists
murzikaleks [220]
C. They show that they are stronger so they then return it and do not attack due to the fact that the united states would win
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 13 of 20
skelet666 [1.2K]

The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.

Explanation

Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.

Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.

6 0
3 years ago
Why does Hamilton think judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis?
Tomtit [17]

"They will be flexible and inconsistent in doing their job" is the right answer.  

According to Hamilton, the judiciary must be autonomous in order to achieve its main goal in a democratic government. It is vitally important in a democracy that individual magistrates and the judiciary as a body are impartial and autonomous of all outside pressures. As a result, the permanent position of the judges would be able to gain the confidence of people and society that their cases will be resolved impartially.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did King George III strictly enforce the Navigation Acts?
aleksley [76]

<em>Why did King George III strictly enforce the Navigation Acts?</em>

A) Britain wanted to expand trade and needed more resources from the colonies..

<em>Britain was losing money in trade with the colonies. Britain wanted to expand trade and needed more resources from the colonies. Britain wanted the colonies to pay for part of the cost of the French and Indian War. George II wanted to show the colonies his power.</em><em>European nations during the 17th- and 18th-centuries believed in the economic theory of mercantilism. In a mercantilist system, there is believed to be a limited amount of wealth in the world. One nation's gain was another's loss. Thus, monarchs sought to tightly control trade within their colonies.</em>

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the greatest achievement of el Libertador, Simón Bolívar? A. He freed Venezuelans from Spanish rule. B. He helped Berna
AleksandrR [38]

The  correct answer is actually A. He freed Venezuelans from Spanish rule.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Pacholke says, “The way we think about our work changes our work.” How do you understand this statement? Explain it in your own
    7·1 answer
  • 16. Which of the following was a solution to the weaknesses found in the Articles of Confederation
    6·1 answer
  • Name the five founding fathers that did not attend the constitutional convention
    15·1 answer
  • Zoroastrianism originated in which classical civilization?
    6·2 answers
  • While serving a nine-day jail term in 1963 for violating a ban on demonstrations, Martin Luther King Jr., wrote his eloquent ple
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following best defines the underlined word in the sentence below:
    9·2 answers
  • In what ways did the new deal programs extend federal aid
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following are the constitutional requirements for president
    9·1 answer
  • Explica ¿Como ocurrió la guerra con los Estados Unidos?
    13·1 answer
  • How was the munich pact an act of appeasement
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!