Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer: There is a reversible error because of the possible prejudice to the governor in the dismissal of the juror.
Explanation: A juror is a member of a jury. A jury are group of people chosen from the general population whose duty is to hear and decide on a case in a court of law.
If an elderly woman claims that she is being pressured to by other jurors to find the Governor guilty, then this a case of prejudice i.e the jurors are making an adverse judgement.
Therefore, the Governor has a case in any event he appeals since the judgment appears to be based on prejudice.
Answer: Social developmental neuroscience
Explanation:
Social developmental neuroscience is is one of the psychological concept that helps in understanding the biological system and concepts such as genetic mechanism and the cellular concepts.
The social development neuroscience also describe about the various types of interpersonal social behavior of the person by refining various types of theories and concepts.
According to the given question, Charles nelson views basically reflect about the emerging field of the social developmental neuroscience connection between the cognitive and the brain process.
Therefore, Social developmental neuroscience is the correct answer.
Herbivore
Omnivore
Carnivore
Herbivore
Can I plz get brainliest
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
