1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ugo [173]
3 years ago
5

Which explains why Ottoman leaders began a policy of deportation and extermination of Armenians within their empire?

History
2 answers:
kaheart [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

They feared that Armenians were supporting Russia, an Ottoman enemy in World War I.

Explanation:

Solnce55 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A) They claimed that Armenians were trying to establish their own state within the Ottoman Empire

Explanation:

The Ottomans lost lot of territory from what was once the large, and very powerful empire. Because of this, they were forcing everyone to declare themselves as Turks, as well as to accept the Sunni Islam, thus to create a state with one ethnic group and one religion. The Armenians were not fond of this and rejected it, so the Ottomans were afraid that they will try to separate part of the country thus make it even smaller. Because of this, the Ottomans started  with genocide over the Armenians, resulting on over 1.5 million deaths, and many more displaced, people separated from their families, and even mothers separated from their little children.

You might be interested in
PLZ HELP!! I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
SSSSS [86.1K]
The magna carta

the first and foremost modern constitution of a nation... upon which all nations constitutions were based

the first civil and judiciary setting valued for a free and democratic enterprise to flourish from

the institutionalization of power thru legitimacy and merit... and the importance of social order

the military might and the expansionary nature of empires highlighted and how properly to conduct the affairs of an empire
6 0
2 years ago
why did people after world war ii believe that conservatism would not regain popularity in the united states?
Dmitrij [34]

According to social theory, many people after World War II believe that conservatism would not regain popularity in the United States because several reasons. One of the reasons is that conservatism is associated with anti-Semitism.

Therefore, people believed that since World War II fought against antisemitism, conservatism would no longer be popular in American society.

Other reasons many people after World War II believe that conservatism would not regain popularity in the United States include the following:

  • Conservatism is believed to favor a social hierarchy over equality.
  • Conservatism is assumed to have the belief in conspiracy theories.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many people in America thoughts conservatism would not be popular after World War II.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21542068

3 0
2 years ago
2. How did the Agricultural Revolution lead into the Industrial Revolution?
timama [110]

Answer:

The Agricultural Revolution of the 18th century paved the way for the Industrial Revolution in Britain.

Explanation: It is important to note industrialization also has resulted in being dependent on agriculture this leads to degrading natural resources, depletes human resources, and destroys economic opportunities. You will eventually need to put the two together in order to form a substansial econmy

5 0
2 years ago
"A person who takes a thing belonging to another by force is liable to an action of theft, for who can be said to take the prope
Viktor [21]
The answer is B. A person who takes another person's wallet by force. I just took the quiz and got 100% :)
Hope this helps and Good luck!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ASAP 40 POINTS! What focus should Oklahoma take for the future of fossil fuels? Write a letter to the government abo
Sever21 [200]
Dear Trump,
In the future, I believe that the state of Oklahoma should not use fossil fuels as the primary source of energy. Instead, I think the state should create a miniverse, where inside that miniverse, the inhabitants can use physical labor to create a source of power where 20% is used for the inhabitants of the miniverse, and the remaining 80% should be sent through the miniverse to power our homes and car batteries. This may sound like slavery with extra steps to you, but if you disagree, you're probably getting laid in college or something. This offer is completely valid, and it should be taken into consideration in exchange of fossil fuels, which continues to pollute our planet. Take note, a miniverse causes no pollution.

Yours truly,
Person who asked this question


4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Attempting to control colonial trade, England passed the _____, declaring that the colonies could only sell certain items, such
    6·1 answer
  • Difference between Arctan and arctan?
    11·1 answer
  • How does the Talmud affect the daily lives of Jewish people?
    10·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes an advantage of indirect democracy over direct democracy
    15·1 answer
  • What type of livestock is<br> raised in the Edwards<br> Plateau region?
    10·1 answer
  • How can global warming lead to changes to the Earth’s surface?
    7·2 answers
  • What was Alexander the great's most lasting achievement?
    14·1 answer
  • What piece of material evidence exists to demonstrate that Jesus was crucified for political reasons?
    7·1 answer
  • Plzzz help I’ll give brainliest and extra points
    15·1 answer
  • The Holocaust occurred in what continent ?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!