The proof that shows that the United States' was willing to compromise on their human rights agenda when it helped meet its Cold War Interests is:
- As a result, the United States actively worked to destabilize Chile's economy and to foster resentment against Allende.
<h3>What is Compromise?</h3>
This refers to the change in policy or values of a person so as to achieve a set goal which is usually unpleasant.
With this in mind, we can see that the United States were ready to compromise their values so that they could win the Cold War by meddling in the affairs of a sovereign nation to oust their leader.
Read more about Cold War here:
brainly.com/question/366925
Bleeding Kansas<span>, </span>Bloody Kansas<span> or the Border War was a series of violent political confrontations in the United States involving anti-slavery</span>
Answer:
I am pretty sure its sports television
Answer: During the First Indian War of Independence in 1857, Sir Syed stayed loyal to the British and saved European lives. After the rebellion was over, Sir Syed wrote an essay title “The Causes of the Indian Revolt” and claimed that the British were the main cause the rebellion. To close the gap between British Christians and the Indian Muslims, Sir Syed wrote 'The Loyal Mohammedans of India' in which he asked the British to end their hostility and proved that Muslims were loyal to the British. Furthermore, he wrote Tabyin-ul-Kalam, showing the similarities between the Quran and the Bible. He also established British Indian Association and continued to support both, closing the gap between Christians and Muslims.
Explanation: Hope this helps!
The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, as developed in the case Marbury v. Madison.
Judicial Review means that if someone objects to an action of Congress, they can file a suit and that suit can work its way through the Federal Court system with the Judiciary making a determination if Congress has acted within its Constitutional purview.
